Proceedings of the 1978 Annual Conference on - ACM 78 1978
DOI: 10.1145/800127.804160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis Of Recurrent Software Errors In A Real-Time Control System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cases considered here are the power law (PLP), the Musa-Okumoto (MOP) (Musa and Okumoto 1984), the Goel-Okumoto (GOP) (Goel and Okumoto 1978) and a generalized form of a Goel-Okumoto (GGOP) processes defined, respectively, by the following mean value functions,…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases considered here are the power law (PLP), the Musa-Okumoto (MOP) (Musa and Okumoto 1984), the Goel-Okumoto (GOP) (Goel and Okumoto 1978) and a generalized form of a Goel-Okumoto (GGOP) processes defined, respectively, by the following mean value functions,…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An activation/correction model for related design faults is needed. The one proposed is a generalization of the Goel and Okumoto model [4], and is described by the following hypotheses: 1) initially there are k related design faults with probability q k , k ≥ 1, 2) the total related design fault activation rate when k ≥ 1 faults are present is ψ k , 3) a related design fault, when activated, causes identical errors with probability c (error correlation), 4) an activated related desing fault causing a disagreement is diagnosed as such with probability E d (diagnosis efficiency) and with probability 1 − E d is treated as a transient physical fault 1 , i.e., the system is restarted without correction, 5) a diagnosed related design fault is properly corrected in a version with probability E c (correction efficiency), 6) a related design fault not properly corrected in any version leaves the same related design fault activation rate as the system had before.…”
Section: Model Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this limitation, Goel and Okumoto [GOE78b,GOE78d,GOE79b] proposed an imperfect debugging model IDM] which is basically an extension of model TBF1 tJEL72].…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%