An analysis of pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine information on social networks and the internet: Visual and emotional patterns

Abstract

The communication of information about vaccines and anti-vaccines is analyzed through the monitoring of issuers, news sites, groups, and messages in social networks. We also investigate the effects of information on people's attention, emotion, and engagement, which were analyzed using eye tracking, galvanic skin response (GSR) and facial expression methods. Results: the flow of communication was not constant, both in the press and on web sites (376 news in 2015, 74 in 2016, 69 in 2017 and, 268 in 2018); posts were informative and neutral; and 80% came from non-professional sources (only 17% were written by a journalist and 3% by a health specialist). On social networks, anti-vaccine Facebook messages and groups were identified, and a mapping of influencers is presented. Analysis of the temporal evolution (years 2015 to 2018) of communicative flows showed that anti-vaccine posts decreased. Gender differences appeared in the visual exploration of information sources and in the provoked emotion responses (GSR and facial expression). In pro-vaccine pages women looked at the headline first, while men looked at the photograph. Emotional responses and engagement did not show differences between anti-vaccine and pro-vaccine web sites. No differences were found in the emotion provoked (GSR) between both website types: anti-vaccination persuasion occurred via cognitive, not emotional, methods by using heuristics (e.g., conspiracy theories). Emotional responses and engagement did not show differences between pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine web sites.

Vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaccination in the time of COVID-19: A Google Trends analysis

“…Various discourse analysis studies have shown that, anti-vaccination social and online posts will contain emotional rhetoric, story recounts, and heightened fear around vaccine safety [2] , [7] , [11] , [18] , [19] . Pro-vaccine posts have been found to generally attempt to counter these stories with fact, statistics and evidence-based articles [18] , [19] , [20] .…”

Opinions of parents concerning childhood vaccine refusal and factors affecting vaccination in Konya

“…Although television, radio, and newspapers were mentioned as the sources of information in some studies, internet and social media are becoming more and more popular as an source of information on vaccines (13,29). On the other hand, only 3.0% of the content about vaccines on the internet was found to be created by health professional (30).…”

Neuromarketing Highlights in How Asperger Syndrome Youth Perceive Advertising

“…All members participated voluntarily and were informed about the research and its stages beforehand. Previous neuromarketing studies have determined that a sample size of between 15 and 50 subjects guarantees the validity of the research ( Kerr-Gaffney et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2018 ; Cuesta-Cambra et al, 2019 ; Mañas-Viniegra et al, 2020 ).…”