1980
DOI: 10.1086/112812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of parallaxes determined in two coordinates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gott et al 2001). Throughout the kinematic analysis, when we mention a "mean", we are actually using the average of (1) the median, (2) the Chauvenet clipped mean (Bevington & Robinson 1992), and (3) the probit mean (Lutz & Upgren 1980), i.e. a "mean" that is remarkably immune to the effects of outliers.…”
Section: Kinematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gott et al 2001). Throughout the kinematic analysis, when we mention a "mean", we are actually using the average of (1) the median, (2) the Chauvenet clipped mean (Bevington & Robinson 1992), and (3) the probit mean (Lutz & Upgren 1980), i.e. a "mean" that is remarkably immune to the effects of outliers.…”
Section: Kinematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we mention a "standard error", we are actually using the average of (1) the error of the true median (Gott et al 2001), and (2) the standard error of the Chauvenet clipped mean (Bevington & Robinson 1992). When we mention "dispersion", we are quoting the average of (1) the 68 per cent confidence intervals, and (2) the probit standard deviation (Lutz & Upgren 1980). In the limit of a Gaussian distribution lacking outliers, these quantities are asymptotically identical to their normal counterparts: the mean, standard error of the mean, and standard deviation.…”
Section: Kinematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. In the bottom row of the same figure, we show probability plots (see, e.g., Lutz & Upgren 1980;Reid et al 2002b) to help assess how closely a single Gaussian distribution fits our data. As can be seen in the plots, a straight line, corresponding to a single Gaussian distribution, is only marginally consistent with our data.…”
Section: Potential Explanations Of the Old Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of 12 plate constants fitting the Turner equations is unbiased if the residuals ∆ξ, ∆η of the final group of reference stars are of mean value zero, Gaussian and independent (Gauss-Markoff theorem, Babu & Feigelson 1996). A half-normal plot (Lutz & Upgren 1980) of these residuals was used to define the significant level σ µ of the total p.m. µ and we observed σ µ ≈ 3σ G , with a final percentage of stars fitting a normal distribution on the order of 75% of the total number of stars on a plate. As a result of this procedure, a set of 4.8 × 10 5 stars with significant p.m. µ ≥ (0.015 ± 0.005) yr −1 is extracted out of a survey of 1.9 × 10 6 stars and is considered as the set of foreground stars.…”
Section: Retrospective Of Early Astrographic Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%