All Days 1989
DOI: 10.2118/18836-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Oil/Water Flow Phenomena in Horizontal Pipes

Abstract: Extensive experimental data were acquired for oil-water flow in horizontal pipes for a very wide range of oil viscosity. Pressure drop, flow rate, input water fraction, in-situ holdup, mixture temperature, and flow pattern data were obtained for 612 oil-water tests in 1.5-in. pipe, and 587 tests in 1-in. pipe. Oils with viscosities of 4.7, 58, 84, and 115 cp were used in the 1.5-in. runs, while the 1-in. tests used 237-cp and 2116-cp oils, all measured at 70 degrees F. Mixture velocities varied from 1.5 to 12 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
84
0
9

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
84
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 1950s, much research has been done to understand the flow pattern of the oil-water two-phase flow. For this purpose, a series of experiments were conducted by Russell [2] (1959), Charles [3] (1961), Guzhov [4] (1973), Malinowsky [5] (1975), Oglesby [6] (1979), Martinez [7] (1983), and Arirachakaran [8] (1989), to name but a few. From 1990 onward, the following scholars realized more accurate measurement of various parameters of flow patterns, and objective analysis of the flow patterns of oil-water two-phase flow thanks to the advancement of instrument and technology: Trallero [9] (1995), Trallero and Brill [10] (1996), Nadler and Mewes [11] (1997), Angeli and Hewitt [12] (1998), Shi and Jepson [13] (1999), Angeli and Hewitt [14] Trallero (1995), the oil-water two-phase flow patterns could be classified into two categories: the segregated flows (ST; ST&MI) and dispersed flows (Do/w&w; O/w; Dw/o&Do/w; W/o).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1950s, much research has been done to understand the flow pattern of the oil-water two-phase flow. For this purpose, a series of experiments were conducted by Russell [2] (1959), Charles [3] (1961), Guzhov [4] (1973), Malinowsky [5] (1975), Oglesby [6] (1979), Martinez [7] (1983), and Arirachakaran [8] (1989), to name but a few. From 1990 onward, the following scholars realized more accurate measurement of various parameters of flow patterns, and objective analysis of the flow patterns of oil-water two-phase flow thanks to the advancement of instrument and technology: Trallero [9] (1995), Trallero and Brill [10] (1996), Nadler and Mewes [11] (1997), Angeli and Hewitt [12] (1998), Shi and Jepson [13] (1999), Angeli and Hewitt [14] Trallero (1995), the oil-water two-phase flow patterns could be classified into two categories: the segregated flows (ST; ST&MI) and dispersed flows (Do/w&w; O/w; Dw/o&Do/w; W/o).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, no rules for flow pattern transitional boundary were proposed. Arirachakaran et al [3] observed stratified flow, mixed flow, annular flow, intermittent flow and dispersed flow in a horizontal 25.1 mm-inner-diameter (ID) pipe. Trallero et al [4] made a systemic experimental and model investigation for horizontal oil-water two-phase flow in a 50.8 mm-ID pipe and provided a new observation and definition for complex horizontal oil-water flow behavior, forming the widely acceptant flow pattern classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stratified oil-water model was presented which gave good accuracy in the prediction of pressure gradients observed by this study and others for segregated oil-water flows. Arirachakaran et al (1989) collected extensive experimental data for oil-water flows in horizontal pipes for a wide range of oil viscosity. Six different flow patterns were used in their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%