1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00352565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of market-index certificates of deposit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is part of the empirical literature dealing with SFPs. The first empirical examinations were conducted for Market Index Certificates of Deposit and an S&P Index Note at the U.S. market by Chen and Kensinger (1990) and Chen and Sears (1990). They use the default-free theoretical value as a reference and compare it with prices quoted by the banks.…”
Section: Journal Of Futures Markets Doi: 101002/futmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is part of the empirical literature dealing with SFPs. The first empirical examinations were conducted for Market Index Certificates of Deposit and an S&P Index Note at the U.S. market by Chen and Kensinger (1990) and Chen and Sears (1990). They use the default-free theoretical value as a reference and compare it with prices quoted by the banks.…”
Section: Journal Of Futures Markets Doi: 101002/futmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Kensinger (1990), Chen and Sears (1990), Baubonis et al (1993) and Benet et al (2006) report significant deviations for equity-linked products on the US market. Brown and Davis (2004) detected significant price deviations for endowment warrants on the Australian market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[1] In the case of the USA, there are only a handful of investigations dealing with their valuation, and these go back to the time when such products were first launched. CHEN and KENSINGER (1990) investigate products with a capital guarantee issued by commercial banks at the time of their issue, whilst CHEN and SEARS (1990) analyse the pricing of one similar product in both the primary and secondary market. Both studies find that the instruments were considerably overvalued when issued, whilst the latter established an undervaluation in the secondary market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%