Abstract:Late deaths (after more than 1 year) after liver transplantation were analyzed in a series of 464 consecutive patients who received liver grafts between 1982 and 1993. Recipients who survived the first posttransplant year (n = 365) had actuarial 5- and 10-year survival rates of 92% and 84%, respectively. Thirty-five patients died between 1.1 and 7.6 years after transplantation (mean, 3.2 +/- 1.9 years). The most common causes of death were related to immunosuppression (40%), namely, chronic rejection, opportun… Show more
“…13 The somatic symptoms that we found (excess appetite, trembling, and headaches) can be considered to be the side effects of immunosuppressive drugs. It was reported that deaths related to immunosuppressive treatments from chronic rejection, opportunist infections, and lymphoma represent 40% of late mortality after LT. 23 Pinson et al 24 are convinced that results of the QOL can be used similarly to the rate of rejection to determine immunosuppression regimen or other strategies of patient management. During recent years, a dramatic improvement has been achieved in the area of electronic data transmission.…”
We assessed the impact of liver transplantation (LT) on the quality of life (QOL) of French recipients 1 year after surgery. A French version of the questionnaire used by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease-Pittsburg, USA (NIDDK), was validated by the back-translation method. Five QOL domains were evaluated: measures of disease, psychological distress, personal function, social function, and general health perception. Patients enrolled onto the waiting list completed the questionnaire before and 1 year after LT. Respondents were age-and gender-matched with healthy subjects recruited from the general population (GP). One year after LT, the analysis of data from 67 consecutive patients showed dramatic improvement in the five domains. Compared with baseline, patients noted fewer disease-related symptoms (P < .0001) and lower level of distress overall (P < .001). However, levels of distress caused by excess appetite (P < .01), trembling (P < .05), and headaches (P ؍ .06) were more likely to increase than decrease. Twenty-five percent of patients prevented by their disease from going to work before LT were no longer so limited at 1-year follow-up. General health perception improved remarkably, with seven times as many recipients reporting improved health as reporting worse health. A correlation was found between the pretransplantation severity of cirrhosis and the social and role function after LT (P < .05). In summary, the French version of the NIDDK questionnaire seems to be reliable. The results of transplant recipients were generally close to those of the general population. Although it is not a true return to normal status, it approaches it. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:703-711.)
“…13 The somatic symptoms that we found (excess appetite, trembling, and headaches) can be considered to be the side effects of immunosuppressive drugs. It was reported that deaths related to immunosuppressive treatments from chronic rejection, opportunist infections, and lymphoma represent 40% of late mortality after LT. 23 Pinson et al 24 are convinced that results of the QOL can be used similarly to the rate of rejection to determine immunosuppression regimen or other strategies of patient management. During recent years, a dramatic improvement has been achieved in the area of electronic data transmission.…”
We assessed the impact of liver transplantation (LT) on the quality of life (QOL) of French recipients 1 year after surgery. A French version of the questionnaire used by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease-Pittsburg, USA (NIDDK), was validated by the back-translation method. Five QOL domains were evaluated: measures of disease, psychological distress, personal function, social function, and general health perception. Patients enrolled onto the waiting list completed the questionnaire before and 1 year after LT. Respondents were age-and gender-matched with healthy subjects recruited from the general population (GP). One year after LT, the analysis of data from 67 consecutive patients showed dramatic improvement in the five domains. Compared with baseline, patients noted fewer disease-related symptoms (P < .0001) and lower level of distress overall (P < .001). However, levels of distress caused by excess appetite (P < .01), trembling (P < .05), and headaches (P ؍ .06) were more likely to increase than decrease. Twenty-five percent of patients prevented by their disease from going to work before LT were no longer so limited at 1-year follow-up. General health perception improved remarkably, with seven times as many recipients reporting improved health as reporting worse health. A correlation was found between the pretransplantation severity of cirrhosis and the social and role function after LT (P < .05). In summary, the French version of the NIDDK questionnaire seems to be reliable. The results of transplant recipients were generally close to those of the general population. Although it is not a true return to normal status, it approaches it. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:703-711.)
“…1,2 As long-term liver transplant survival improves, cardiovascular complications are emerging as a major cause of both morbidity and mortality. In an early retrospective analysis of late deaths after liver transplantation, Asfar et al 3 found that of 365 patients who survived the first transplant year (from an original cohort of 465 consecutive patients), 35 patients died between 1.1 and 7.6 years after transplantation. Five of these late deaths (14%) were from cardiovascular disease, representing the third most common cause of late mortality, after recurrence of the primary liver disease and complications of immunosuppression.…”
Section: Atherosclerotic Disease In Liver Transplant Recipientsmentioning
Key Points 1. As long-term survival improves after liver transplantation, cardiovascular complications are emerging as a major cause of late morbidity and mortality. It seems reasonable to correct the potentially reversible cardiovascular risk factors of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and obesity, in addition to hypertension. 2. The results of liver transplantation in diabetics are acceptable in terms of morbidity, mortality, and prevalence of posttransplant diabetes, but the poor outcomes described in some series suggest that more extensive testing for macro-and microvascular disease may become necessary. T he main aim of liver transplantation, besides the immediate goal of saving life, is to return the patient to productive community living with good quality of life. It is ironic, therefore, that many of the health problems that afflict successful liver transplant recipients long term are those of community living in the developed world, including diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and obesity. These three metabolic derangements, together with hypertension, constitute adverse cardiovascular risk factors for transplant recipients.
The management of diabetes in liver transplant recipients is not substantially different from its management in
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.