Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-44973-4_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Hall-of-Fame Strategies in Competitive Coevolutionary Algorithms for Self-Learning in RTS Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although the contribution of the ''archive methods'' to reduce the number of drawbacks (e.g., missing features and cycling) of coevolutionary systems is undeniable, their implementation entails a number of issues that have to be taken into account such as the strength of the archive members and the control of the archive diversity. So for instance, a high risk of generating cycles can appear if the strength of a member is valued by pitting this member against a fixed set of opponents, and this is precisely what we did in our previous work (Nogueira et al 2012(Nogueira et al , 2013. A key point to consider is the metric that defines the strength of an individual, which should indicate when an individual is qualitatively superior to the rest but without losing sight of the fact that sometimes quantitative superiority does not correspond with a high strength.…”
Section: (Competitive) Coevolution In Gamessupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, although the contribution of the ''archive methods'' to reduce the number of drawbacks (e.g., missing features and cycling) of coevolutionary systems is undeniable, their implementation entails a number of issues that have to be taken into account such as the strength of the archive members and the control of the archive diversity. So for instance, a high risk of generating cycles can appear if the strength of a member is valued by pitting this member against a fixed set of opponents, and this is precisely what we did in our previous work (Nogueira et al 2012(Nogueira et al , 2013. A key point to consider is the metric that defines the strength of an individual, which should indicate when an individual is qualitatively superior to the rest but without losing sight of the fact that sometimes quantitative superiority does not correspond with a high strength.…”
Section: (Competitive) Coevolution In Gamessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Using Planet Wars we propose, in this paper, a modified and improved version of a CC algorithm that we already described in Nogueira et al (2012Nogueira et al ( , 2013 for a simplistic capture-the-flag game. The latter used the HoF as a longterm memory mechanism to keep the winning strategies found in each coevolutionary step and all of them were also used in the evaluation process (in the basic algorithm).…”
Section: Hofcc Algorithm and Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-G decides which policies in the menagerie, π ∈ π o , will be discarded from the menagerie. The curator bears resemblance with the notion of Hall of Fame from evolutionary algorithms [23]. As Hall of Fame algorithms also consider the problem of curating a policy set over time.…”
Section: A Framework Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the archive mechanisms such as the Hall of Fame (HoF) [9,6,5] have been studied in the past and are known to maintain progress in an evolutionary arms race, they do not provide any specific guarantees in terms of convergence to the optimal solution. Moreover, the characteristics of archive's influence on evolving individuals is little known, which constitutes the main motivation for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%