2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of forward exchange rate biasedness across developed and developing country currencies: Do observed patterns persist out of sample?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the FPB between the developed currency set and developing currency set over the turbulent period is consistent with the findings of Loring and Lucey (2013) who conclude that the FPB is less pronounced for developed currencies compared to developing currencies over the period May 2004-September 2011. This outcome can reflect our results in the previous section where β estimates for some developing country currencies (HUF, INR, TRY and ZAR) remained negative or became more negative over turbulent period.…”
Section: Pooled Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in the FPB between the developed currency set and developing currency set over the turbulent period is consistent with the findings of Loring and Lucey (2013) who conclude that the FPB is less pronounced for developed currencies compared to developing currencies over the period May 2004-September 2011. This outcome can reflect our results in the previous section where β estimates for some developing country currencies (HUF, INR, TRY and ZAR) remained negative or became more negative over turbulent period.…”
Section: Pooled Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They argue that because emerging country currencies are riskier and their trend of movement is easily identifiable compared to developed market currencies, these results are in favour of systematic expectational errorsbased explanations of the bias and against time variant risk-based explanations. In contrast, Loring and Lucey (2013) extend the sample period used by Frankel and Poonawala (2010) and examine the FPB from 2004 to 2011 for 13 developed and 14 emerging country currencies against the US dollar. They dismiss the results that the bias is more pronounced for developed country currencies.…”
Section: 𝐸 𝑡 (𝑠mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…quarter of 1990 and ending at the first quarter of 2001.31 This period is subdivided to obtain in-sample and out-of-sample periods in line with the work ofLoring & Lucey (2013). The first ends at the first quarter of 1999 (the Euro introduction date).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%