1992
DOI: 10.2307/1381877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of External Features as Predictors of Reproductive Status in Small Mammals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No trapping was conducted during 2000, complete post-treatment trapping was conducted in 2001-2003. Traps were checked in the morning and afternoon, and the following data were recorded: trap location and size, species, new or recapture, individual identity, age class, sex, mass, and release condition. We classified animals as either adults or subadults based on mass and external evidence of reproductive status (McCravy and Rose, 1992). Animals were individually identified with two unique ear tags.…”
Section: Small Mammal Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No trapping was conducted during 2000, complete post-treatment trapping was conducted in 2001-2003. Traps were checked in the morning and afternoon, and the following data were recorded: trap location and size, species, new or recapture, individual identity, age class, sex, mass, and release condition. We classified animals as either adults or subadults based on mass and external evidence of reproductive status (McCravy and Rose, 1992). Animals were individually identified with two unique ear tags.…”
Section: Small Mammal Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peromyscus were aged using pelage characteristics (Conventry 1937;Gottschang 1956;Layne 1968). Microtus were aged using three different criteria, in which possession of any one signified adulthood: (1) duration on the study site (≥3 months), (2) reproductive state (testes descended in males and perforate, lactation condition, or pregnancy in females), or (3) mass (males >28.0 g and females >26.0 g; Nadeau 1985;McCravy and Rose 1992). Although mass may not be an accurate age classification criterion for rodents (Dueser et al 1981(Dueser et al , 1984Tamarin 1984), the goal of the investigation was not to describe natural history patterns over time, but to compare controls and treatments.…”
Section: Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accurately assess squirrel populations, external reproductive indicators must be recognizable and accurate. McCravy and Rose (1992) used necropsy to evaluate breeding condition in small rodents. They found nipple size was a better predictor of breeding status than condition of the pubic symphysis or vagina.…”
Section: Developmentreproductive Condition and Litter Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muul (1969b) and Sollberger (1943) describe the reproductive biology of southern flying squirrels (Glaucomys volans [Linnaeus 1758]). McCravy and Rose (1992) analyze external features that may be used as predictors of reproductive status of small mammals in the field. Morris (1972) reviews aging methods used to assess both relative and absolute age in mammals.…”
Section: Introduction World Status Of Flying Squirrels Ecology In Thementioning
confidence: 99%