2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcan.2022.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of energy consumption and carbon footprints of cryptocurrencies and possible solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite FinTech's promises, FinTech firms face Expediting financial inclusion in Tanzania challenges such as regulatory and compliance risks, rapid technological change, unstable technology infrastructure and trust (Frost, 2020;J€ unger and Mietzner, 2020;Najaf et al, 2021). Moreover, FinTech infrastructure needs fossil energy to operate, contributing to escalated levels of CO 2 emission (Kohli et al, 2023). For instance, cryptocurrency mining consumes high levels of energy, which contributes to high levels of CO 2 (Hajipour et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2023).…”
Section: Literature Review Fintech Financial Inclusion and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite FinTech's promises, FinTech firms face Expediting financial inclusion in Tanzania challenges such as regulatory and compliance risks, rapid technological change, unstable technology infrastructure and trust (Frost, 2020;J€ unger and Mietzner, 2020;Najaf et al, 2021). Moreover, FinTech infrastructure needs fossil energy to operate, contributing to escalated levels of CO 2 emission (Kohli et al, 2023). For instance, cryptocurrency mining consumes high levels of energy, which contributes to high levels of CO 2 (Hajipour et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2023).…”
Section: Literature Review Fintech Financial Inclusion and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, FinTech infrastructure needs fossil energy to operate, contributing to escalated levels of CO 2 emission (Kohli et al ., 2023). For instance, cryptocurrency mining consumes high levels of energy, which contributes to high levels of CO 2 (Hajipour et al ., 2022; Zhang et al ., 2023).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further study by Kohli et al [69] reveals that in contrast to the big player Bitcoin and Ehereum, smaller cryptocurrencies, such as IOTA (FPC) and Hedera (Hashgraph), consume typically between 10 −4 and 10 −2 kWh, respectively, the latter thus consuming ~36 kJ per hour = ~315.4 MJ per year. This gives some credence to the value proposed by the short analysis above, starting from first principles, of ~2 MJ per year for a single blockchain active company.…”
Section: Further Expansion Opportunities and Potential Roadblocks For...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PoW consensus mechanism, and also redundancy in operation and traffic are the two main reasons for the high energy consumption of digital currency mining. The total energy consumption of PoW-based Bitcoin is at least three orders of magnitude higher than that of the highest-consuming proof of stake (PoS) system [45][46][47]. Besides, energy consumption due to redundant operations and network traffic has caused the system to store the complete ledger on all nodes in the network, which is another challenge.…”
Section: The Gap Aims and Objectives Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 99%