Proceedings of the Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures - SPAA '94 1994
DOI: 10.1145/181014.181361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of diffusive load-balancing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convergence conditions have also been established for distributed consensus on dynamically changing graphs (e.g., [13,20,26,34]) and with asynchronous communication and computation ( [2]; see also the early work in [31,32]). Other work gives bounds on the convergence factor W − J for a particular choice of weights, in terms of various geometric quantities such as conductance (e.g., [30]). When W ij are nonnegative, the model (1) corresponds to a symmetric Markov chain on the graph, and W − J is the second largest eigenvalue magnitude (SLEM) of the Markov chain, which is a measure of mixing time (see, e.g., [6,8,10]).…”
Section: X(t + 1) − J X(0) W − J X(t) − J X(0) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergence conditions have also been established for distributed consensus on dynamically changing graphs (e.g., [13,20,26,34]) and with asynchronous communication and computation ( [2]; see also the early work in [31,32]). Other work gives bounds on the convergence factor W − J for a particular choice of weights, in terms of various geometric quantities such as conductance (e.g., [30]). When W ij are nonnegative, the model (1) corresponds to a symmetric Markov chain on the graph, and W − J is the second largest eigenvalue magnitude (SLEM) of the Markov chain, which is a measure of mixing time (see, e.g., [6,8,10]).…”
Section: X(t + 1) − J X(0) W − J X(t) − J X(0) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cybenko [3] (see also [13,15]) shows a tight connection between the convergence rate of the diffusion algorithm and the absolute value of the second largest eigenvalue λ max of the diffusion matrix P with P ij = 1/(d + 1) if {i, j} ∈ E. Subramanian and Scherson [15] observe similar relations between convergence time and certain properties of the underlying network like electrical and fluid conductance.…”
Section: Continuous Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Note that this method balances the load perfectly if the number of steps is sufficiently large. Here we consider the (arguably more realistic [15]) case of discrete diffusion where tokens are indivisible. Quantifying by how much the integrality assumption decreases the efficiency of load balancing is an interesting question and has been posed by many authors (e.g., [8,[11][12][13][14][15]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very natural question is how much this integrality assumption decreases the efficiency of load balancing. In fact, finding a precise quantitative relationship between the discrete and the idealized case is an open problem posed by many authors, e.g., [9,11,15,16,28,31,33,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the natural diffusion paradigm, an arbitrary amount of load can be sent along each edge at each step [31,33]. For the idealized case of divisible load, a popular diffusion algorithm is the first-order-scheme by Subramanian and Scherson [36] whose convergence rate is fairly well captured in terms of the spectral gap [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%