IEEE INFCOM '91. The Conference on Computer Communications. Tenth Annual Joint Comference of the IEEE Computer and Communicatio 1991
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1991.147595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of deflection routing in multi-dimensional regular mesh networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the network get saturated for a much smaller offered load (roughly 0.3 rather than 0.45). Thus, as observed in [12], a sequential rather than simultaneous treatment of the packets does not allow to reduce the number of deflections locally, and the throughput decreases: the throughput of greedy slotted routing is roughly the same as the throughput of unslotted routing. Moreover, as shown in [10], the distribution of the number of deflections for greedy slotted networks and for unslotted networks offers roughly the same shape (same median, same standard deviation, etc.).…”
Section: Comparison Between Slotted and Unslotted Networkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, the network get saturated for a much smaller offered load (roughly 0.3 rather than 0.45). Thus, as observed in [12], a sequential rather than simultaneous treatment of the packets does not allow to reduce the number of deflections locally, and the throughput decreases: the throughput of greedy slotted routing is roughly the same as the throughput of unslotted routing. Moreover, as shown in [10], the distribution of the number of deflections for greedy slotted networks and for unslotted networks offers roughly the same shape (same median, same standard deviation, etc.).…”
Section: Comparison Between Slotted and Unslotted Networkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, their implementation calls for a hardware that produces substantial signal degradation [6]. Additionally, the slotting of these networks does not allow the adaptation of packet sizes to the specific demands of different applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Optical networks can use hot-potato or deflection routing to avoid losing packets and avoid acknowledgements; see [9,26,27]. )…”
Section: Fiber Optic Crossbarmentioning
confidence: 99%