2023
DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Crosswalks from Research Data Schemas to Schema.org

Abstract: The increased number of data repositories has greatly increased the availability of open data. To enable broad discovery and access to research dataset, some data repositories have begun leveraging data discovery services from commercial search engines by embedding structured metadata markup in dataset web landing pages using vocabularies from Schema.org and extensions. This paper aims to examine metadata interoperability for supporting global data discovery. Specifically, the paper reports a survey on which m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While available in Schema.org, funding information is not generally captured by repositories, and some providers like Harvard Dataverse collect funding information 40 but do not standardize or expose it 41 . To promote compatibility with other commonly used schemas, we provide a crosswalk between our NIAID SysBio schema, Schema.org, and Google Dataset Search ( Table 1 ), as well as a more extensive table ( Supplemental Table 2 ) which compares our schema to an analysis of data schemas including DataCite and Dublin Core by the RDA Research Metadata Schemas Working Group 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While available in Schema.org, funding information is not generally captured by repositories, and some providers like Harvard Dataverse collect funding information 40 but do not standardize or expose it 41 . To promote compatibility with other commonly used schemas, we provide a crosswalk between our NIAID SysBio schema, Schema.org, and Google Dataset Search ( Table 1 ), as well as a more extensive table ( Supplemental Table 2 ) which compares our schema to an analysis of data schemas including DataCite and Dublin Core by the RDA Research Metadata Schemas Working Group 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our goal was not to create a new standard, but to generate links between standards, our approach was to extend existing classes with new properties to promote findability of infectious and immune-mediated disease assets. Essential to promote translation between standards, we developed a crosswalk to other common schemas, based on the work of the Research Metadata Schemas Working Group of the Research Data Alliance 42 (see Supplemental Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our goal was not to create a new standard, but to generate links between standards, our approach was to extend existing classes with new properties to promote findability of infectious and immune-mediated disease assets. Essential to promote translation between standards, we developed a crosswalk to other common schemas, based on the work of the Research Metadata Schemas Working Group of the Research Data Alliance 44 (see File 3 available on Zenodo 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While available in Schema.org, funding information is not generally captured by repositories, and some providers like Harvard Dataverse collect funding information 42 but do not standardize or expose it 43 . To promote compatibility with other commonly used schemas, we provide a crosswalk between our NIAID SysBio schema, Schema.org, and Google Dataset Search (File 2 available on Zenodo 41 ), as well as a more extensive table (File 3 available on Zenodo 41 ) which compares our schema to an analysis of data schemas including DataCite and Dublin Core by the RDA Research Metadata Schemas Working Group 44 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our ontology-based metadata crosswalks focused on specific content and descriptive metadata that representing classes and relationships of different concepts related to people. Thus, we not map other administrative or structural metadata, including compliance and versioning data (Wu et al, 2022). In this paper, ontology-based metadata crosswalk construction was undertaken in four steps:…”
Section: Ontology-based Metadata Crosswalkmentioning
confidence: 99%