2009
DOI: 10.1186/1747-597x-4-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of abstracts presented to the College on Problems of Drug Dependence meeting and subsequent publication in peer review journals

Abstract: Background: Subsequent publication rate of abstracts presented at meetings is seen as an indicator of the interest and quality of the meeting. We have analyzed characteristics and rate publication in peer-reviewed journals derived from oral communications and posters presented at the 1999 College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD) meeting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show a lower rate of peer review journal publication of the abstracts presented at our Medical Student Meetings than that seen at meetings of practicing physicians, which range from 35 to 65% [1][2][3] . Possible reasons may include: 1) a higher quality of abstracts originated from established researchers who attend meetings of professional societies and 2) our attempt to be all inclusive and register many of the abstracts presented by our students to give them the opportunity of presenting their findings thereby decreasing the percentage of published papers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results show a lower rate of peer review journal publication of the abstracts presented at our Medical Student Meetings than that seen at meetings of practicing physicians, which range from 35 to 65% [1][2][3] . Possible reasons may include: 1) a higher quality of abstracts originated from established researchers who attend meetings of professional societies and 2) our attempt to be all inclusive and register many of the abstracts presented by our students to give them the opportunity of presenting their findings thereby decreasing the percentage of published papers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Comparing two five year periods 1981-1985 and 1997-2001, national Brazilian scientific production increased fourfold (Medline), with a growth of 5.3 times in the percentage of cited papers and 1.8 in the impact factor of publications 1,2 . Recent studies 1,3,4 have shown that, in the last decade, academic research has helped place Brazil among the twenty most productive countries in health sciences worldwide. Growth in volume of publication of the twenty universities that most appeared in the Medline database in the three year periods of 1998-2000 and 2001-2003, ranged from 15% to 231% 1,2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations