1969
DOI: 10.1177/002246696900300104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of a Work-Study Program for Inner-City Pupils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One author (Myers, 1969) reports differences with probabilities less than .O1 as &dquo;particularly evident,&dquo; &dquo;important,&dquo; and &dquo;sizable&dquo; whereas another difference, significant at the .05 level, is only &dquo;a mild tendency.&dquo; Comparative differences in the level of statistical significance do not necessarily indicate the presence of a strong relationship between independent variables and dependent variables. Many authors, although they do not attempt to interpret strength of relationship from differing probability values in the text, report differing values of p in their recording of the statistical results (i.e., p < .02, for one value of the F statistic, p < .005 for another, and so on).…”
Section: Implications For Research Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One author (Myers, 1969) reports differences with probabilities less than .O1 as &dquo;particularly evident,&dquo; &dquo;important,&dquo; and &dquo;sizable&dquo; whereas another difference, significant at the .05 level, is only &dquo;a mild tendency.&dquo; Comparative differences in the level of statistical significance do not necessarily indicate the presence of a strong relationship between independent variables and dependent variables. Many authors, although they do not attempt to interpret strength of relationship from differing probability values in the text, report differing values of p in their recording of the statistical results (i.e., p < .02, for one value of the F statistic, p < .005 for another, and so on).…”
Section: Implications For Research Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 95%