1975
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-197510000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of a Rebreathing Method for Measuring Lung Volume in the Premature Infant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heaf et al (25) Differences in mode of ventilation may have contributed to these discrepancies (23,26). We can consequently confirm the observations that infants with IRDS and a demand for respiratory support have lower FRC than comparable groups without lung disease (27)(28)(29)(30). As shown in Figure 2, there was no correlation between PEEP level and FRC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Heaf et al (25) Differences in mode of ventilation may have contributed to these discrepancies (23,26). We can consequently confirm the observations that infants with IRDS and a demand for respiratory support have lower FRC than comparable groups without lung disease (27)(28)(29)(30). As shown in Figure 2, there was no correlation between PEEP level and FRC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…FRC in our preterm infants was 22.5 ± 2.1 ml/kg, which is in the range of previous studies in spontaneously breathing preterm infants using gas dilution techniques. 7,23,24 The correlation between weight and FRC was strong. No significant gender difference in mean FRC was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…in our volume measurements the mean helium dilution time was 110 s, with nondilution time less than 60 s. This insured that the equilibrium had in fact been reached in these normal premature newborns [15,20,21], as confirmed by the FHe record ings showing a plateau level for more than 30 s [15], Our mean values and ranges for FRC were in agreement with those pre viously published [13-15, 20, 22-24], Our study however avoided using oxygen-en riched mixtures which lower FRC, as com pared to values obtained with the use of 21 % oxygen (15], Thus, a valid comparison of our results can only be made with the data from Geubelle et al [14,15] and Berglund and Karlberg [13], who published FRC values measured when the baby is breathing a gas mixture with 0.21 FICH and using the same method as used here. Our mean FRC in QS (1.36 ml/cm) was somewhat lower than that of Geubelle (1.5 ml/cm), but the ranges were almost the same in both studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, trapped gas [ 15,20,24] may explain the higher values for TGV than for FRC. The mean TGV in AS [1], which is very similar to our mean FRC in AS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%