1986
DOI: 10.2307/1381134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of a Method for Comparing Residents and Colonists in a Natural Population of Microtus ochrogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Movements between cropfields and their borders were estimated from the percentage of C. laucha individuals that moved between them. The relationships between the numbers of resident and colonizing individuals was studied by means of the method of Danielson et al (1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movements between cropfields and their borders were estimated from the percentage of C. laucha individuals that moved between them. The relationships between the numbers of resident and colonizing individuals was studied by means of the method of Danielson et al (1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass categories have often been used to classify young voles as either site born or immigrant (e.g. Dueser et al 1984;Boonstra et al 1987); however, mass is not totally reliable (Tamarin 1984;Tamarin and Sheridan 1987;Danielson et al 1986). Although we use more conservative mass cutoffs than those used in previous studies (Beacham 1979;Hilborn 1975), some individuals thought to be immigrants may have been born on the grid and escaped capture for a month.…”
Section: Radiotelemetry Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass of some adults decline to less than 30 g during winter, resulting in immigrants being misidentified as young born in the site. Danielson et al (1986), Tamarin and Sheridan (1987), Dueser (1989, 1990), and Pugh and Tamarin (1991) indicated that there is obvious bias in identifying immigrants by body mass alone, but that such a method appears a logical, albeit conservative, method for use in open populations. With no other method available to identify immigrants, we used body mass > 30 g for identifying immigrants, taking into account the above discussions and the following observations from our study:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%