2010
DOI: 10.1137/080728056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of a Broken $P_1$-Nonconforming Finite Element Method for Interface Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the basis functions are modified so that they satisfy the interface conditions, they seem to work well [10], [20], [21]. These methods were extended to the case of Crouzeix-Raviart P 1 nonconforming finite element method [12] by Kwak et al [18], and to the problems with nonzero jumps in [7]. Some related works on interface problems can be found in [5], [16], [17], [19], [22], [23], [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the basis functions are modified so that they satisfy the interface conditions, they seem to work well [10], [20], [21]. These methods were extended to the case of Crouzeix-Raviart P 1 nonconforming finite element method [12] by Kwak et al [18], and to the problems with nonzero jumps in [7]. Some related works on interface problems can be found in [5], [16], [17], [19], [22], [23], [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these assumptions, we know that the solution u(x) ∈ H 2 (Ω i ) for i = 1, 2. There are many applications of such an interface problem; see, e.g., the works of Sutton and Balluffi (1995), Zienkiewicz and Taylor (2000), Li and Ito (2006) or Kwak and Chang (2010) and the references therein. Many numerical methods have been developed for solving such an important problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these can have adverse effects on conditioning and require the determination of the stabilization parameters. Instead of using Lagrange multipliers or stabilization, the methods of [66,43,58,80,71,44,74] alter the basis functions to either satisfy the constraints directly, or simplify the process of doing so. In this regard, such methods represent the finite element analogues of the IIM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%