2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis method for atomistic abrasion simulations featuring rough surfaces and multiple abrasive particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). An analysis of the drift velocity histograms and a study of the crystallographic order in the defined zones, as discussed in further detail in [4], justify this approach. The applicability of the chosen identification scheme can also be illustrated using the drift velocity map of one of the simulated systems (see Fig.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2). An analysis of the drift velocity histograms and a study of the crystallographic order in the defined zones, as discussed in further detail in [4], justify this approach. The applicability of the chosen identification scheme can also be illustrated using the drift velocity map of one of the simulated systems (see Fig.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The total number of atoms remains constant throughout a simulation run, and periodic boundary conditions are applied in the lateral directions so that an atom that exits the simulation box to one side re-enters it from the opposing one. As explained in detail in [4], the difference between the modelling of the polishing and grinding processes is that in the polishing process, the grits are restricted to the spherical geometry, may roll across the surface and have the possibility of avoiding topographic obstacles by moving in the y direction, which is orthogonal to the sliding motion. They may also adjust their z-position individually as would be the case in a polishing slurry.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations