Abstract:By employing the Pearson correlation, Fisher-and t-tests, the present study analyzes and compares scientometric data including number of source items, number of citations, impact factor, immediacy index, citing half-life and cited half-life, for essential journals in physics, chemistry and engineering, from SCI JCR on the Web 2002. The results of the study reveal that for all the scientometric indicators, except the cited half-life, there is no significant mean difference between physics and chemistry subjects… Show more
“…9 For example, Tsay (2009) analyzes scientometric data between journals of physics, chemistry and engineering and finds some evidence for differences in citation behavior among scientists in these disciplines, although this comparison is restricted to a period of one year (2002). While our argument -that the difference in responsiveness to incentives across disciplines contributes to the differences in citation patterns -is surely of a cognitive origin, an evaluative approach to scientometrics would be able to offer several alternative explanations.…”
Section: Reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting lack of diversity within the economic discipline has been studied empirically, in particular by analyzing the relative citation flows between 13 high-ranked mainstream and 13 high-ranked heterodox economic journals in two different periods: before -2008Dobusch & Kapeller 2012b) and after the recent financial and economic crisis (2009Aistleitner et al 2018). The results indicate that the monistic and closed citation behavior exhibited by (highly-ranked) mainstream economic journals remained stable after the crisis, as the mainstream journals continue to devote only minimal attention to heterodox inputs (as is evidenced by the small share of citations -less than 3% -imported from heterodox sources 13 ; see Figure 9).…”
In this paper we comparatively explore three claims concerning the disciplinary character of economics by means of citation analysis. The three claims under study are: (1) economics exhibits strong forms of institutional stratification and, as a byproduct, a rather pronounced internal hierarchy, (2) economists strongly conform to institutional incentives and (3) modern mainstream economics is a largely selfreferential intellectual project mostly inaccessible to disciplinary or paradigmatic outsiders. The validity of these claims is assessed by means of an interdisciplinary comparison of citation patterns aiming to identify peculiar characteristics of economic discourse. In doing so, we emphasize that citation data can always be interpreted in different ways, thereby focusing on the contrast between a 'cognitive' and an 'evaluative' approach towards citation data.
“…9 For example, Tsay (2009) analyzes scientometric data between journals of physics, chemistry and engineering and finds some evidence for differences in citation behavior among scientists in these disciplines, although this comparison is restricted to a period of one year (2002). While our argument -that the difference in responsiveness to incentives across disciplines contributes to the differences in citation patterns -is surely of a cognitive origin, an evaluative approach to scientometrics would be able to offer several alternative explanations.…”
Section: Reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting lack of diversity within the economic discipline has been studied empirically, in particular by analyzing the relative citation flows between 13 high-ranked mainstream and 13 high-ranked heterodox economic journals in two different periods: before -2008Dobusch & Kapeller 2012b) and after the recent financial and economic crisis (2009Aistleitner et al 2018). The results indicate that the monistic and closed citation behavior exhibited by (highly-ranked) mainstream economic journals remained stable after the crisis, as the mainstream journals continue to devote only minimal attention to heterodox inputs (as is evidenced by the small share of citations -less than 3% -imported from heterodox sources 13 ; see Figure 9).…”
In this paper we comparatively explore three claims concerning the disciplinary character of economics by means of citation analysis. The three claims under study are: (1) economics exhibits strong forms of institutional stratification and, as a byproduct, a rather pronounced internal hierarchy, (2) economists strongly conform to institutional incentives and (3) modern mainstream economics is a largely selfreferential intellectual project mostly inaccessible to disciplinary or paradigmatic outsiders. The validity of these claims is assessed by means of an interdisciplinary comparison of citation patterns aiming to identify peculiar characteristics of economic discourse. In doing so, we emphasize that citation data can always be interpreted in different ways, thereby focusing on the contrast between a 'cognitive' and an 'evaluative' approach towards citation data.
“…Studies have investigated trends in engineering research, as shown in the publications stored in different databases for varying periods of time [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Some have explored the collaborative dimensions hidden in such scientific publications [10][11][12].…”
The production of scientific publications in engineering in South Africa has expanded over the last three decades. Because engineering is an important science, this expansion has implications for the growth and development of the economy. Drawing on a sample range of years of the publications stored in the ISI Web of Knowledge, the engineering publications of South Africans for a 30-year period from are analysed. This analysis shows that the production of scientific publications in engineering by South African researchers has increased during the analysed period; that the number of researchers per publication has grown; that the number of countries collaborating with South Africa has increased; and that the number of sole-authored papers has decreased. Domestic collaboration (between researchers within South Africa) has decreased, while international collaboration has grown considerably. The key objective of the paper is to find out whether the production of publications is related to the level of collaboration, and to see how collaboration can be regressed from other known variables. It is clear from the study that collaboration is a decisive factor in the production of scientific publications in engineering in South Africa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.