2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13398-016-0320-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analogue for Marcinkiewicz–Zygmund strong law of negatively associated random variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main result of this paper fills this gap. Recently, Miao et al [35] have studied the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund-type strong law of large numbers where the norming constants are of the form n 1/α log β/α n for some β ≥ 0, which is a special case of our result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main result of this paper fills this gap. Recently, Miao et al [35] have studied the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund-type strong law of large numbers where the norming constants are of the form n 1/α log β/α n for some β ≥ 0, which is a special case of our result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…By letting L(x) ≡ 1, Theorem 3.1 generalizes a seminal result of Baum and Katz [1] on complete convergence for sums of independent random variables to weighted sums of negatively associated random variables. Recently, Miao et al [35] proved the following proposition.…”
Section: Complete Convergence For Weighted Sums Of Negatively Associated and Identically Distributed Random Variablesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 1 ≤ α < 2, L(x) is a slowly varying function defined on [A, ∞) with some A > 0 and L(x) is the de Bruijn conjugate of L(x). For more conclusions on the M-Z-type strong LLN in the classical framework see Bai and Cheng [21], Chen and Gan [22], Miao, Mu and Xu [23], and Sung [24]. Inspired by Anh et al [20] under the classical framework, in this paper we generalize to the framework of sublinear expectation theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%