2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An amperometric glucose biosensor based on a GOx-entrapped TiO2–SWCNT composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7(B)). The sensitivity of the enzyme electrode was calculated to be about 9.04 μA mM −1 cm −2 , which was higher than those reported at a GOx/TiO 2 -SWCNT/ITO-based glucose biosensor (5.32 μA mM −1 cm −2 ) [38] and GOx/titania sol/gel film (7.2μA mM −1 cm −2 ) [39]. Furthermore, according to the electrochemical version of the LineweaverBurk plot [40], the apparent Michaelis-Menten constant (K app m ) for the GOx/Fe 3 O 4 -RGO/MGCE is estimated to be 0.34 mM, which is smaller than that of GOx on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes of 2.2 mM [41].…”
Section: Electrocatalytical Behavior Of the Fecontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…7(B)). The sensitivity of the enzyme electrode was calculated to be about 9.04 μA mM −1 cm −2 , which was higher than those reported at a GOx/TiO 2 -SWCNT/ITO-based glucose biosensor (5.32 μA mM −1 cm −2 ) [38] and GOx/titania sol/gel film (7.2μA mM −1 cm −2 ) [39]. Furthermore, according to the electrochemical version of the LineweaverBurk plot [40], the apparent Michaelis-Menten constant (K app m ) for the GOx/Fe 3 O 4 -RGO/MGCE is estimated to be 0.34 mM, which is smaller than that of GOx on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes of 2.2 mM [41].…”
Section: Electrocatalytical Behavior Of the Fecontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Due to the observably increasing request in diabetes clinical diagnostics [1] and the requirements in the food industry [2] and life science [3], the development of accurate, reliable and low cost devices for glucose detection becomes one of the most important scientific focuses. Since Updike and Hicks [4] detected glucose concentration in biological fluids for the first time by immobilizing glucose oxidase (GOD) on oxygen electrode in 1967, a great number of biosensors based on the GOD have been investigated [5][6][7][8]. These sensors could obtain high sensitivity and selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its excellent properties for glucose detection, low cost and easy preparation method, this novel electrode active nanocomposite will be a promising candidate in the development of convenient and effective enzyme-free glucose sensor. 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dung et al [42] described a TiO 2 -Single Wall Carbon Nanotube sensor that had a linear range of detection significantly less than the pH 12 silica sensor we produced, a similar response time to our sensor, and a lower sensitivity than our pH 12 silica sensor. The addition of carbon nanotubes are known to improve glucose sensor sensitivity and response time ; therefore it is encouraging that our sensitivity was comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%