2011 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society 2011
DOI: 10.1109/nafips.2011.5752016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An &#x2113;<inf>1</inf>-algorithm for underdetermined systems and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform this comparison, we applied each of the two algorithms 30 times, and for each application, we computed the distance ∥x − x∥ 2 The average of these values is 1191.01, which is smaller than the average distance corresponding to the original algorithm.…”
Section: Testing the New Algorithm: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To perform this comparison, we applied each of the two algorithms 30 times, and for each application, we computed the distance ∥x − x∥ 2 The average of these values is 1191.01, which is smaller than the average distance corresponding to the original algorithm.…”
Section: Testing the New Algorithm: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…|a i | instead of the discontinuous expression ∥a∥ 0 ; see, e.g., [2]. The ℓ 1 -norm is convex, so if J is also convex (and it often is), then we get an additional advantage of being able to use known algorithms for minimizing convex functions.…”
Section: Need To Use Sparsity-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While numerous algorithms and methodologies have been proposed to solve this problem in the presence of Gaussian noise e.g. (Chen et al, 2001;Kim et al, 2007;Figueiredo et al, 2007;Wright et al, 2008;Argaez et al, 2011;Becker et al, 2010), strategies addressing the case of impulse or sparse noise are more limited. Recently, the works of Nikolova (2004), Fu et al (2006) and Bar et al (2006) studied the recovery problem in the presence of impulse noise but in an image processing setting and for complete datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several numerical methods have proliferated for solving (1) in which the fidelity term is measured with the 2 norm, e.g. (Chen et al, 2001;Kim et al, 2007;Figueiredo et al, 2007;Wright et al, 2008;Argaez et al, 2011;Becker et al, 2010), research efforts aimed at solving (1) as it is presented here have been more limited. Such works include Fu et al (2006), where problem (1) is posed as a linear programming problem and solved using interior point methods; Nikolova (2004), who considers the denoising case, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the recent successful algorithms proposed for sparse signal recovery problems in [1], [7], [14], we apply the selective nature of sparse representation to solve classification problems. A test sample is represented in an overcomplete dictionary with the training samples as base elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%