2018
DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.11.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) prospective multi-center research protocol: outcomes of urethral realignment versus suprapubic cystostomy after pelvic fracture urethral injury

Abstract: BackgroundPelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) occur in up to 10% of pelvic fractures. It remains controversial whether initial primary urethral realignment (PR) after PFUI decreases the incidence of urethral obstruction and the need for subsequent urethral procedures. We present methodology for a prospective cohort study analyzing the outcomes of PR versus suprapubic cystostomy tube (SPT) after PFUI.MethodsA prospective cohort trial was designed to compare outcomes between PR (group 1) and SPT placement (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because PR is easier to carry out in patients with minor injury that might heal regardless of the selected managements, such selection bias could make it appear that the PR is more effective than it actually is. 44 The success rate of PR at a level 1 trauma center in the USA has been reported to be just 9%, which is lower than that reported previously. 8 PR is technically demanding, and the degree of urethral damage caused by PR depends on the skill of the surgeon.…”
Section: Presentation and Assessment Of Pfuismentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because PR is easier to carry out in patients with minor injury that might heal regardless of the selected managements, such selection bias could make it appear that the PR is more effective than it actually is. 44 The success rate of PR at a level 1 trauma center in the USA has been reported to be just 9%, which is lower than that reported previously. 8 PR is technically demanding, and the degree of urethral damage caused by PR depends on the skill of the surgeon.…”
Section: Presentation and Assessment Of Pfuismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In contrast, the existing literature also showed several problems of PR in the acute management of PFUI. Because PR is easier to carry out in patients with minor injury that might heal regardless of the selected managements, such selection bias could make it appear that the PR is more effective than it actually is . The success rate of PR at a level 1 trauma center in the USA has been reported to be just 9%, which is lower than that reported previously .…”
Section: Acute Management Of Pfuimentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arterial repair should be attempted in cases of patients with only one kidney or in those with bilateral renal injuries. Urine extravasation is not by itself an indication for OM in the acute setting [18, 169, 180].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, long-term follow-up of realigned patients has found a stenosis-free survival rates as low as 9%, as well as raised concerns regarding delays in definitive treatment [12][13][14]. A prospective, multiinstitutional trial is currently underway to provide a better assessment of the outcomes and impact of urethral realignment as compared to SPT for PFUI patients [15]. The impact of pelvic vascular injury management has not been well evaluated prior to the current study.…”
Section: Acute Managementmentioning
confidence: 98%