2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative topic model based on Common Interest Authors for topic evolution analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While these approaches allow detection of merging and splitting of time-spanning topics and their transitional ratio at the temporal level, the use of text-based topic models inherently limits predictive capabilities; evolutionary events such as emerge, merge, or split can only be retrospectively analyzed once topics are captured from a document set. Using author groups from a bibliographic dataset for determining topics carried over time by the evolving author groups showed that when topics defined by the authors are used instead of NLP-based topic models, topic evolution on the temporal network is possible; the topic evolution events are defined by network structures, and therefore a predictive analysis is possible [23].…”
Section: Identifying and Predicting New Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While these approaches allow detection of merging and splitting of time-spanning topics and their transitional ratio at the temporal level, the use of text-based topic models inherently limits predictive capabilities; evolutionary events such as emerge, merge, or split can only be retrospectively analyzed once topics are captured from a document set. Using author groups from a bibliographic dataset for determining topics carried over time by the evolving author groups showed that when topics defined by the authors are used instead of NLP-based topic models, topic evolution on the temporal network is possible; the topic evolution events are defined by network structures, and therefore a predictive analysis is possible [23].…”
Section: Identifying and Predicting New Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional topic evolution methods mimic the process by utilizing text-based topic models to understand topics in each document collection and track topical changes over time. Topic modeling methods extract statistical constructs based on word co-occurrences in the given document collection, where changes in topics can only be measured by differences between the content of two topics; connections and correlations between different topics are not incorporated into traditional topic modeling methods [23]. Topic evolution methods are therefore mostly limited to identifying content transition within a given topic, not how it is correlated to other topics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of a single topic is thus proceeded by conver the words with a high probability contribution, and if the number of words under a t is too high or low, the interpretation of the deduced topic will be difficult. If the num of topics is too high or low, the words within each topic may be duplicated to be e nated or the topic may show a reduced correlation to pose challenges in interpreta Many researchers who utilize topic-modeling methods point out that loss of interpret ity is a major limitation of complex learning algorithms such as topic models, that say, it is important to note that topics produced by complex algorithms are numeric va based on mathematical properties, but the interpretation of them depends on the goa the analysis, the researcher's perspectives and domain knowledge [35][36][37][38]. Thus, the perparameter, as directly set by the user, should allow the optimum number to be d mined through several reasonable attempts based on the experimental values or sc for the topics to be deduced.…”
Section: Lda Topic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of M is given in Table 4. To estimate TESs in M, the concept of similarity has been widely used in most related works [9,5,11,16,1,3]. The fundamental is to formulate a similarity measure between x and y using the aggregated similarities between x's top-k descriptive terms and y's top-k descriptive terms (often K=10) [19,3].…”
Section: Input Data Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%