2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijedpo.2011.040261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative to Monte Carlo simulation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of experimentation, a full factorial experimental plan (3 3 ) L27 OA was adopted where the considered parameters were varied at three levels as given in Table 1. This design had 27 rows corresponding to the number of tests (26 degrees of freedom) with 13 columns at three levels [20,21]. Laser power, assist gas pressure and cutting speed were assigned to columns 1, 2, and 5, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of experimentation, a full factorial experimental plan (3 3 ) L27 OA was adopted where the considered parameters were varied at three levels as given in Table 1. This design had 27 rows corresponding to the number of tests (26 degrees of freedom) with 13 columns at three levels [20,21]. Laser power, assist gas pressure and cutting speed were assigned to columns 1, 2, and 5, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common ways to conduct uncertainty analysis is through Monte Carlo simulations (Hsu, 2012) which randomly produce samples of the parameter to analyse the level of uncertainty in the results. Considering the probabilities on a subjective basis in the Monte Carlo simulations bring some doubt over suitability of the method (Gadallah 2011). Van Groenendaal and Kleijnen (1997) propose methods from design of experiments (DOE) as an alternative to identify the most influential factors on profitability of a project without considering probability distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%