2016
DOI: 10.1080/02589001.2016.1202584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative to democratic exclusion? The case for participatory local budgeting in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The established structures and interaction facilitation mechanisms, such as the typical izimbizo (mass gatherings or meetings), ward committees and IDP processes, are created spaces that are mostly symbolic and have not lived up to their expectations of bridging the gap between communities and local government entities. In line with this, Bassett (2016) attests that despite the potential for citizen participation to improve democratic transparency and lead to policies supporting the interests of the disadvantaged, local governments have followed a hierarchical and plutocratic strategy that has given people minimal spaces to control municipal decisions.…”
Section: Citizen Participatory Mechanisms In Local Government: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The established structures and interaction facilitation mechanisms, such as the typical izimbizo (mass gatherings or meetings), ward committees and IDP processes, are created spaces that are mostly symbolic and have not lived up to their expectations of bridging the gap between communities and local government entities. In line with this, Bassett (2016) attests that despite the potential for citizen participation to improve democratic transparency and lead to policies supporting the interests of the disadvantaged, local governments have followed a hierarchical and plutocratic strategy that has given people minimal spaces to control municipal decisions.…”
Section: Citizen Participatory Mechanisms In Local Government: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…O halde, TCDB sürecinde 19 | 2021; 19 (2); İktisadi İdari Bilimler Sayısı katılımcılığı artıracak uygun yöntemlerin benimsenmesi ve bunun için de bütçeleme sürecinin topluluklar ve bireyler üzerindeki kritik etkisinin daha net aktarılması gerekmektedir (Aydemir-Uslu, 2017, s. 44). TCDB yaklaşımı, kamu kaynakların kullanımında ve mal ve hizmet sunumunda belirleyici faktörün kıt kaynaklardan ziyade öncelikler meselesi olduğu görüşüne dayanmaktadır (Bassett, 2016). Dolaysıyla, bütçe döngüsünün başından sonuna kadar her bir aşamada vatandaşların sürece dahil edilmesi, ama aynı zamanda onların süreci takip edebilme ve anlayabilme ve toplumsal cinsiyete göre ayrıştırılmış kesişimsel veriler yoluyla analiz ve değerlendirme kapasitelerinin güçlendirilmesi gerekmektedir (Aydemir-Uslu, 2017).…”
Section: Toplumsal Cinsiyete Duyarlı Bütçeleme: Tarihsel Ve Kuramsal Arkaplanunclassified
“…Participatory budgeting has evolved in many respects, but it has also become a very popular -or even fashionable tool of decentralization and improvement of local governance, applied on all continents ("Participatory Budgeting Worlwide", 2013), not only in democratic states (He, 2011). With its introduction in other political systems, social contexts and procedural circumstances, participatory budgeting had to change, facing new challenges and consequently, leading to different results (Basset, 2016) and the evolution does not always correspond to the ambitious original framework, including the ethical aspect. As argued in a broad study of 2013, entitled "Participatory Budgeting Worldwide -Updated Version" (Sintomer, Herzberg, Allegretii, 2013), the process is now present on virtually all continents, however, the forms of its implementation are sometimes extremely far from the Porte Alegre objectives.…”
Section: Participatory Budgeting As a Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%