2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2913313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Alternative Specification for Technical Efficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function

Abstract: This paper proposes an alternative specification for technical efficiency effects in a stochastic production frontier model. The proposed specification is distribution free and thus eschews onesided error term present in almost all the existing inefficiency effects models. The efficiency effects are represented by the standard normal cumulative distribution function of exogenous variables which ensures the efficiency scores to lie in a unit interval. An empirical exercise based on widely used Philippines rice … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is based on the concept that a production system can be defined by a series of smooth and continuously differentiable concave production transformation functions, with the frontier representing the limit of all feasible production outcomes. This method offers the benefit of concurrently estimating the individual technical efficiency of participating farmers and identifying the factors influencing their technical efficiency (Paul et al, 2017). The initial specification of this approach includes a production function with two components: one to accommodate random effects and another to quantify technical efficiency.…”
Section: Stochastic Production Frontier Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on the concept that a production system can be defined by a series of smooth and continuously differentiable concave production transformation functions, with the frontier representing the limit of all feasible production outcomes. This method offers the benefit of concurrently estimating the individual technical efficiency of participating farmers and identifying the factors influencing their technical efficiency (Paul et al, 2017). The initial specification of this approach includes a production function with two components: one to accommodate random effects and another to quantify technical efficiency.…”
Section: Stochastic Production Frontier Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parametric stochastic frontier models with the scaling property are normally estimated by nonlinear least squares (e.g. Simar et al 1994;Deprins and Simar 1989;Paul and Shankar 2017;Parmeter and Kumbhakar 2014) or ML (e.g. Simar et al 1994;Wang and Schmidt 2002)).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting extension of this idea was recently proposed by [81] for the setting where u i has already been converted into technical efficiency. In this case the level of inefficiency must be bound between 0 and 1.…”
Section: Estimation Without Imposing Distributional Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the level of inefficiency must be bound between 0 and 1. To account for this [81] model, the impact of z on the level of inefficiency through a probit function. Again, given the nonlinear nature of the probit function, this necessitates the use of NLS if one wishes to eschew distributional assumptions.…”
Section: Estimation Without Imposing Distributional Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%