2014
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative method using microwave power saturate in fingernail/electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry

Abstract: An alternative method for fingernail/electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry valid at low doses (0-3 Gy) is suggested in this paper. The method consisted of two steps. The first step involved dehydrating fingernail clippings to remove their water content by heating them at 70 °C for 72 h. As the water content in the fingernails decreased, the variability of the EPR signals improved. The second step involved measuring and fitting the EPR signals at successive microwave power levels. A newly derived valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the water content must be removed. According to previous research [ 11 ], fingernails have lost most of their water content and maintain a relatively stable sample mass after a dehydration of 70°C for 180 min. Although evaporating water from fingernails in this way is not complete, the effect of the remaining water content on the EPR measurements is limited.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the water content must be removed. According to previous research [ 11 ], fingernails have lost most of their water content and maintain a relatively stable sample mass after a dehydration of 70°C for 180 min. Although evaporating water from fingernails in this way is not complete, the effect of the remaining water content on the EPR measurements is limited.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another very promising use of physical dosimetry biodosimetry method is based on a dose dependent radiation-induced signal (RIS) in finger- and toenails as a means for estimating radiation dose, offering the additional advantage of accessing dose distribution in an individual. A large effort has been devoted to the analysis of the RIS in finger and/or toenail clippings (Trompier et al 2007, Romanyukha et al 2010, Choi et al 2014, He et al 2014, Romanyukha et al 2014b, Trompier et al 2014, Khailov et al 2015, Wang et al 2015, Marciniak and Ciesielski 2016, Tipikin et al 2016, Sholom and McKeever 2017). The ability of the clipped nail dosimetry method to estimate dose has been demonstrated in individuals receiving a high radiation dose due to accidental exposure (>10 Gy) (Romanyukha et al 2014b, Trompier et al 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of the clipped nail dosimetry method to estimate dose has been demonstrated in individuals receiving a high radiation dose due to accidental exposure (>10 Gy) (Romanyukha et al 2014b, Trompier et al 2014b). Advancing these efforts into a rapid dosimetry method will require improvements in nail sample processing and instrumental innovations (Choi et al 2014, Wang et al 2015, Elajaili et al 2016, Marciniak and Ciesielski 2016) along with implementation of portable X-band EPR instrument platforms (Suzuki et al 2010, Romanyukha et al 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, one of the major problems of EPR dosimetry in nails lies in how to extract the RIS from the experimentally measured signal. Several methods have been proposed to overcome this problem [11,24,34,[41][42][43][44]. However, for doses <10 Gy, all proposed methods to date have limitations due to the fact that in this dose range BKS is typically more intense than the stable RIS 5 and that BKS is known to be variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%