2001
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative method for restoring single-tooth implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between group types were calculated after 1 year and after 2 years, and a correction for simultaneous hypothesis testing was made according to Sidak. 34 The model's assumptions were verified by a normal quantile plot of the residual values. Subsequently, a post hoc analysis was done and a correction according to Sidak was applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between group types were calculated after 1 year and after 2 years, and a correction for simultaneous hypothesis testing was made according to Sidak. 34 The model's assumptions were verified by a normal quantile plot of the residual values. Subsequently, a post hoc analysis was done and a correction according to Sidak was applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The all ceramic or metal ceramic restorations are evaluated and the contacts and occlusion are adjusted as needed then cemented on the definitive abutments with permanent cement ( Figure 11 and Figure 12 ). Occlusion is evaluated with an 8-μm foil (Shim stock Occlusion Foil, Patterson Dental, St. Paul, MN, USA) to achieve resistance to withdrawal only under maximal intercuspation [ 7 , 18 ]. All prosthetic restorations should utilize the manufacturer’s recommended components and protocol.…”
Section: Impression Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%