2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10928-008-9085-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative method for population pharmacokinetic data analysis under noncompliance

Abstract: Noncompliance presents a persistent problem while analyzing PK data from outpatient clinical studies. Ignoring dose omission or making uninformed assumptions about patient drug intake history can prove detrimental to the objectives of the analysis (e.g. determining the PK model parameters or identifying covariates) and ultimately compromise the interpretation of the data. In order to overcome this problem, an alternative method of handling noncompliant data is evaluated in this report. The proposed approach is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postprocessing of NONMEM output was performed using S-Plus (version 7.0 for Linux; Tibco Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA). (10). The ATV structural model was parameterized in terms of first-order absorption rate (k a ), elimination rate (k e ), apparent volume of distribution (V/F), and relative bioavailability (F rel ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Postprocessing of NONMEM output was performed using S-Plus (version 7.0 for Linux; Tibco Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA). (10). The ATV structural model was parameterized in terms of first-order absorption rate (k a ), elimination rate (k e ), apparent volume of distribution (V/F), and relative bioavailability (F rel ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ATV structural model was parameterized in terms of first-order absorption rate (k a ), elimination rate (k e ), apparent volume of distribution (V/F), and relative bioavailability (F rel ). A parameter to describe the predose concentration (C 0 ) was estimated as a separate term in the model to guard against introducing bias in the compartmental PK parameters due to nonadherence (10). The ATV plasma concentration (C) at time t following an ATV dose (D) was described using the following expression:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This metric is analogous to those used previously for simulation studies dealing with noncompliance [4,10] and may be expressed as a percent difference by multiplying the fraction by 100. Overlaid plots of PAR diff versus the magnitude of reporting error in the data set, for each set of data-with and without reporting error-provide insight into the effects of the presence of reporting error on parameter estimation in the data (Figs.…”
Section: Assessment Of Estimation Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the complex case, prior dosing history may be critical. The current methodological body of literature around improving parameter estimation in the presence of dosing inaccuracies has mainly focused on the moderate case [3,4,10,11]; however, over the last 2 years, around 45 % of currently approved oral therapies (geometric mean across 2013 and 2014), intended for once daily dosing, fall into the complex scenario of having a terminal half-life-of the active moiety-of [24 h [12] (see supplementary material worksheet for specific examples). To our knowledge, among the approaches to mitigate the effects of dosing inaccuracies on parameter estimation, only one investigation has considered the complex scenario [1]; however, no attempt was made to specifically characterize the effects stemming from error in reported dosing times, or to include subjects with different dosing times relative to sampling times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%