An alternative method for interpreting JET erosion test (JET) data: Part 2. Application

Abstract

This paper reports the results of jet tester experiments on soil samples of uniform properties which allow quantitative application of the new theory proposed in part 1 of these publications. This theory explores the possibly that a more adequate indicator of soil erodibility may be obtained by using the mass (and so volume) of soil eroded by the jet and the depth of scour penetration, rather than by using penetration depth alone, as assumed in the commonly‐used data interpretation method. It is shown that scour geometry can be well described using a generalized form of the Gaussian function, defined by its standard deviation and maximum depth. Using a published expression for jet kinetic energy flux, the new theory divides this flux into that used to erode soil, and the remainder which is dissipated in a variety of ways. Jet experiments on a specially‐prepared uniform soil sample are reported which provide the key to determining the spatial variability in the profile resistance to erosion offered by field soils. This resistance is expressed in the work required to erode unit mass of soil, denoted as J (in J/kg). The paper also gives results obtained on the profile variation in J for jet tests carried out at riverine sites on the upper Brisbane River, Queensland, Australia. As expected in most natural soil profiles, the results show an increase in J with depth in the profile. The soil resistance (J) is compared to the traditional interpretation of soil erodibility, (kd). The graphical comparison of these two indicators illustrates the inverse type of relationship between them which is expected from their respective definitions, but this relationship is associated with significant scatter. Possible reasons for this scatter are given, together with comments on jet tester experience in a wide variety of soil types. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

An alternative method for interpreting jet erosion test (JET) data: part 1. Theory

“…() developed and tested a new spreadsheet tool supporting a ‘scour depth solution approach’ to data analysis; this method yielded stable results, but different parameter values to other methods. Such uncertainty in the literature supports examining alternative theoretical analysis of the processes at work in JETs, which is the task attempted in this paper, with application made in a companion paper, Haddadchi et al . ().…”

“…Such uncertainty in the literature supports examining alternative theoretical analysis of the processes at work in JETs, which is the task attempted in this paper, with application made in a companion paper, Haddadchi et al . ().…”

“…In order to provide the flexibility required to describe any form of experimental JET data, the direct link between the maximum value of y and the standard deviation σ must be relieved, and this can be achieved using the following generalized form of the Gaussian equation: where importantly, both s and σ are experimentally determined, and not symbolically determined as in the original Gaussian Equation . It is this flexibility in choice of s and σ in Equation that allows it to provide a reasonably good fit to a wide range of experimental data with a wide variety of scour shapes (Aderibigbe and Rajaratnam, ; Haddadchi et al ., ).…”

“…As shown in Haddadchi et al . () this can be achieved by applying the analysis to a number of increasing scour volumes over successive observations of scour development and penetration depth s .…”

“…As shown in Haddadchi et al . (), in this alternative method, dV/dt (or dm/dt ) is an experimentally measured quantity which, (like J ( s )) is also a function of s . Note that for a soil of high resistance to erosion, (that is with high J ( s )), dV/dt will be lower, as would be expected on physical grounds.…”