2015
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative approach for quasi‐static large deformation analysis of saturated porous media using meshfree method

Abstract: Summary An alternative coupled large deformation formulation combined with a meshfree approach is proposed for flow–deformation analysis of saturated porous media. The formulation proposed is based on the Updated Lagrangian (UL) approach, except that the spatial derivatives are defined with respect to the configuration of the medium at the last time step rather than the configuration at the last iteration. In this way, the Cauchy stresses are calculated directly, rendering the second Piola–Kirchhoff stress ten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the standard finite element method (FEM) [4,5] and the finite difference method (FDM) [6], newly developed numerical methods have been continuously used for the FCHM model of porous media, such as the mesh-free method [7], element-free Galerkin method [8], finite volume method [9] and numerical manifold method [10]. Additionally, new FEMs have been developed to overcome the pressure oscillations in lowpermeable and low-compressible porous media, such as the generalized conforming element [11], enhanced strain element [12], mixed finite element [13][14][15] and stabilized element [16].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the standard finite element method (FEM) [4,5] and the finite difference method (FDM) [6], newly developed numerical methods have been continuously used for the FCHM model of porous media, such as the mesh-free method [7], element-free Galerkin method [8], finite volume method [9] and numerical manifold method [10]. Additionally, new FEMs have been developed to overcome the pressure oscillations in lowpermeable and low-compressible porous media, such as the generalized conforming element [11], enhanced strain element [12], mixed finite element [13][14][15] and stabilized element [16].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently in the literature, there have been many studies on the stress state of the wellbore. Whilst Kanfar et al [7], Do et al [8,9], Tran et al [10], Khoshghalb [11,12], Ghaffaripour et al [13], and Shafee and Khoshghalb [14] relied on the hydro-mechanical behavior model, Abousleiman and Ekbote [15] and Kanfar et al [16] based on a full thermo-hydromechanical behavior model of the materials. However, these works mainly focus on the development of analytical and numerical models without emphasizing the difference in stress state around the wellbore between the cases of cooling and heating as well as different anisotropy degrees of the rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Biot's theory was presented more than 75 years ago [4], it has certain limitations when numerical computational techniques are widely used to solve scientific and engineering problems today [6,7,18]. Hence, numerical techniques are commonly used, which are active research areas at present [19][20][21][22][23][24]. The treatment of FCHM-controlled differential equations by a numerical scheme usually contains two processes, i.e., spatial and temporal discretization of basic variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%