An Almost Pure Theory of Legal Interpretation within Legal Science

Sampaio, Jorge Silva

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18671-5_5

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…141 Some suggest that AI can be treated as a legal entity with incomplete capacity, similar to underage children and that its "guardians" (designers, manufacturers, or users) should bear the responsibility. 142 However, this approach is flawed as AI does not possess the conscious ability or the possibility of responsibility reversal. Instead, the natural or legal person behind AI should be treated as the legal entity.…”

Section: Defending the 'Legal Subject'mentioning

confidence: 99%

Expanding the Boundaries of Jurisprudence in the Era of Technological Advancements

Khan,

Muhammad Abid Hussain Shah Jiliani

2023

IIUMLJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the current era of advanced technology, the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data presents intricate challenges in the technical and doctrinal aspects of law and the fundamental principles of jurisprudence. Addressing this challenge entails three potential approaches: reevaluating the independent status of specific foundational categories, reconfiguring the interpretation of such categories, or steadfastly defending and enhancing our understanding of specific classifications. The reconstruction of the essential concept of "law" remains uncertain and necessitates further deliberation. Although the new technological era has not introduced entirely novel jurisprudential dilemmas, it has reconsidered existing perspectives. Swiftly and effectively responding to these challenges becomes paramount in seizing fresh opportunities for the independent advancement of Chinese jurisprudence. The purpose of the study is to push the boundaries of jurisprudence by exploring and addressing legal issues arising in the era of technological advancements. The qualitative research methodology has been applied in this article.

show abstract

Section: Defending the 'Legal Subject'mentioning

confidence: 99%