2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2010.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An “almost” full embedding of the category of graphs into the category of groups

Abstract: We construct a functor F : Graphs → Groups which is faithful and "almost" full, in the sense that every nontrivial group homomorphism F X → F Y is a composition of an inner automorphism of F Y and a homomorphism of the form F f , for a unique map of graphs f : X → Y . When F is composed with the Eilenberg-Mac Lane space construction K(F X, 1) we obtain an embedding of the category of graphs into the unpointed homotopy category which is full up to null-homotopic maps.We provide several applications of this cons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same line of argument provides an answer to Farjoun's question in [20] of whether all homotopy reflections are f -localizations for some map f . It was shown in [17] that the answer is affirmative under Vopěnka's principle, and Przeździecki proved in [42] that an affirmative answer is in fact equivalent to Vopěnka's principle. Here we prove an analogue of Theorem 8.4.…”
Section: Consequences In Homotopy Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same line of argument provides an answer to Farjoun's question in [20] of whether all homotopy reflections are f -localizations for some map f . It was shown in [17] that the answer is affirmative under Vopěnka's principle, and Przeździecki proved in [42] that an affirmative answer is in fact equivalent to Vopěnka's principle. Here we prove an analogue of Theorem 8.4.…”
Section: Consequences In Homotopy Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the precise consistency strength of many implications of this axiom in category theory or homotopy theory is not known, and in some cases the question of whether such statements are provable in ZFC remains unanswered. A relevant step in this direction was made in [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is natural to ask if an isomorphism GX ∼ = GY implies X ∼ = Y . The affirmative answers to the analogous questions in the cases of full embeddings and almost full embeddings in the sense of [25] or [20] are clear. We don't know the answer for the functor G considered here.…”
Section: The Isomorphism Problemmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Proof. Since the functor G preserves countably directed colimits the proof of [20,Proposition 8.8] applies.…”
Section: Orthogonal Subcategory Problem In the Category Of Abelian Grmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all commutative, cotorsion-free rings R we construct embeddings G of the category of graphs into categories of R-modules which are almost full in the sense that the maps induced by the functoriality of G R[Hom Graphs (X, Y )] −→ Hom R (GX, GY ) (1.1) some subcategory of Topological Spaces -it was clear that the "metadefinition" was: an embedding is almost full if it is full up to "obvious sacrifices" imposed by the target category. In this broader sense the term was used in [19] and [20]. In this paper the target category is R-Modules, possibly with some additional structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%