2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ALMA survey of the SCUBA-2 Cosmology Legacy Survey UKIDSS/UDS field: high-resolution dust continuum morphologies and the link between sub-millimetre galaxies and spheroid formation

Abstract: We present an analysis of the morphology and profiles of the dust continuum emission in 153 bright sub-millimetre galaxies (SMGs) detected with ALMA at signal to noise ratios of > 8 in high-resolution 0. 18 (∼ 1 kpc) 870 µm maps. We measure sizes, shapes and light profiles for the rest-frame far-infrared emission from these luminous starforming systems and derive a median effective radius (R e ) of 0. 10 ± 0. 04 for our sample with a median flux of S 870 = 5.6 ± 0.2 mJy. We find that the apparent axial ratio (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
172
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
36
172
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore keep the Sérsic index as a free parameter when fitting the F160W emission but fix the Sérsic index to match an exponential profile (n = 1) for the CO and dust emission. This choice of exponential profile is motivated by the exponential dust-continuum profiles observed for local (e.g., Haas et al 1998;Bianchi 2007;Muñoz-Mateos et al 2009;Bianchi & Xilouris 2011) and high-redshift galaxies (Barro et al 2016;Hodge et al 2016;Tadaki et al 2017a;Calistro Rivera et al 2018;Gullberg et al 2019). Fixing the profile shape for the CO and dust continuum has negligible impact on our conclusions because the half-light radii inferred when forcing n=1 are consistent, within errors, with the values inferred when n is a free parameter.…”
Section: Image-plane Analysismentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We therefore keep the Sérsic index as a free parameter when fitting the F160W emission but fix the Sérsic index to match an exponential profile (n = 1) for the CO and dust emission. This choice of exponential profile is motivated by the exponential dust-continuum profiles observed for local (e.g., Haas et al 1998;Bianchi 2007;Muñoz-Mateos et al 2009;Bianchi & Xilouris 2011) and high-redshift galaxies (Barro et al 2016;Hodge et al 2016;Tadaki et al 2017a;Calistro Rivera et al 2018;Gullberg et al 2019). Fixing the profile shape for the CO and dust continuum has negligible impact on our conclusions because the half-light radii inferred when forcing n=1 are consistent, within errors, with the values inferred when n is a free parameter.…”
Section: Image-plane Analysismentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The extended dust-continuum emission of ALPS.2 differs not only from what is observed for ALPS.1 and 3, but also from other high-redshift galaxies (Figure 9). In most of these, the dust emission is 2-4 timesmore compact than the stellar emission, e.g., for SMGs the 870 μm half-light radii are typically measured to be 3 kpc, whereas the 1.6 μm emission can extend to 8 kpc (Hodge et al 2015(Hodge et al , 2019Simpson et al 2015;Chen et al 2017;Calistro Rivera et al 2018;Gullberg et al 2019;Lang et al 2019). However, based on observations and radiative transfer models of local galaxies, extended dust disks with sizes comparable to the size of the stellar disk are the norm (Xilouris et al 1999;Bianchi 2007;Muñoz-Mateos et al 2009;Holwerda et al 2012).…”
Section: Dust-continuum Versus Rest-frame Optical Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The blue ellipse illustrates the synthesized beam. 0.3 similar to the scale of dust emission in DSFGs (Simpson et al 2015;Gullberg et al 2019). We produce a second set of images with an outer taper of 0.8 to test if we are missing detections because they are resolved out in the higher resolution imaging and to confirm the reliability of source fluxes from the higher resolution maps.…”
Section: Almacal Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%