2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An all-silk-derived functional nanosphere matrix for sequential biomolecule delivery and in situ osteochondral regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since fibrosis exists in the entire pathological process, the release of BMP9 needs to last relative longer compared with VEGF. The release profiles of two bioactive factors could be adjusted by selecting two biomaterials with different degradation rates [ 41 ], or by pre-loading one of the factors in a secondary carrier [ [42] , [43] , [44] ]. For example, we added SF microspheres encapsulated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) into a SF scaffold, which was further functionalized with SDF-1 via physical adsorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since fibrosis exists in the entire pathological process, the release of BMP9 needs to last relative longer compared with VEGF. The release profiles of two bioactive factors could be adjusted by selecting two biomaterials with different degradation rates [ 41 ], or by pre-loading one of the factors in a secondary carrier [ [42] , [43] , [44] ]. For example, we added SF microspheres encapsulated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) into a SF scaffold, which was further functionalized with SDF-1 via physical adsorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If nanoparticles can be accumulated more at the severely defective sites, the therapeutic outcome could be better than that evenly distributed in the articular cavity. The combination of hydrogels or scaffolds with nanoparticles can enhance the stability of nanoparticles and extend the retention of drugs following intra-articular injection [131][132][133] (Table 4). In addition, scaffolds or hydrogels can affect cell survival and provide matrix for cell homing and regeneration [131][132][133][134][135][136].…”
Section: Intra-articular Delivery Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kartogenin (KGN) as a small bioactive molecule to promote chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells was first reported by Johnson et al in 2012 [185]. KGN-loaded nanoparticles have been shown to play a critical role in chondrogenesis and promote cartilage repair in vivo [131,132,186].…”
Section: Promoting Chondrogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silk fibroin (SF) is a natural fibrous polymer that has been applied for osteochondral engineering due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, high tensile strength, and excellent biological characteristics [ [18] , [19] , [20] ]. Nonetheless, traditional silk scaffolds focus mainly on the porous structure of the cartilage layer, which is incompatible with the native cartilage structure and disadvantageous for cartilage formation [ [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] ]. In addition, bilayer or trilayer silk scaffolds are often combined with β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) or ceramics as a subchondral bone layer to obtain high mechanical strength, which results in poor interface strength between the cartilage layer (silk) and the subchondral bone layer (β-TCP or ceramics) [ 18 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%