2017
DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1411555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm to improve outcomes of radial forearm flap donor site

Abstract: Application of the algorithm described has led to a significant reduction in RFF donor site complication rates. This demonstrates that if flap donor sites are analyzed and tailor treated in the same way as primary defects are, instead of being given secondary importance and just grafted, outcomes improve.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often necessary to cover the donor site with a skin graft, resulting in further morbidity in yet another area of the patient’s body. Although there exist many ways of closing an RFFF donor site, there are, as of yet, no established protocols for the management of a problematic donor site, despite attempts at creating this 12. In the authors’ experience, the donor site outcome is generally better if a suprafascial flap can be raised and the donor site can be closed directly or with a local tissue flap, instead of a skin graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is often necessary to cover the donor site with a skin graft, resulting in further morbidity in yet another area of the patient’s body. Although there exist many ways of closing an RFFF donor site, there are, as of yet, no established protocols for the management of a problematic donor site, despite attempts at creating this 12. In the authors’ experience, the donor site outcome is generally better if a suprafascial flap can be raised and the donor site can be closed directly or with a local tissue flap, instead of a skin graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The optimal way of reconstructing the forearm to reduce the RFFF donor morbidity remains controversial, with multiple methods described in the literature (Bonaparte et al, 2013; Chang et al, 2010; D'arpa et al, 2017; Hamahata et al, 2016; Hanna et al, 2014; Ho et al, 2006; Lee et al, 2011; Murray et al, 2011; Shaikh et al, 2018). Direct closure of the forearm is the best choice if possible, but its application is restricted to narrow wounds (Loeffelbein et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recently the RFFF has fallen out of favor due to its unfavorable donor site morbidity with a complication rate in the literature ranging between 6% and 50% (D'arpa et al, 2017; Richardson et al, 1997). Reported donor site complications includes exposure of underlying tendon, delayed wound healing, impaired sensitivity, wrist stiffness, decreased pinch and grip strength, and poor cosmetic scar (Chang et al, 2010; Pabst et al, 2018; Rieger et al, 2016; Zuo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complications of this method are relatively common, and the aesthetic result is sometimes pure. Therefore, a number of alternative methods have been used: full thickness skin graft, local skin flap, tissue expansion, vacuum assisted closure (VAC), cell cultures, synthetic skin substitutes (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). No one of these is ideal and many researches are still focused on the donor site of RFF (32,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%