2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0451-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm to enumerate all possible protein conformations verifying a set of distance constraints

Abstract: BackgroundThe determination of protein structures satisfying distance constraints is an important problem in structural biology. Whereas the most common method currently employed is simulated annealing, there have been other methods previously proposed in the literature. Most of them, however, are designed to find one solution only.ResultsIn order to explore exhaustively the feasible conformational space, we propose here an interval Branch-and-Prune algorithm (iBP) to solve the Distance Geometry Problem (DGP) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This class of problems was, in fact, initially inspired by calculations of 3D protein backbones. However, the DMDGP is actually a general problem that can have other applications [16], not only in structural biology (for this particular application, the reader can make reference to [2]). Although we restrict our discussion to the case K = 3, all presented theoretical results can be trivially extended to any dimension K > 0.…”
Section: Strict Triangular Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This class of problems was, in fact, initially inspired by calculations of 3D protein backbones. However, the DMDGP is actually a general problem that can have other applications [16], not only in structural biology (for this particular application, the reader can make reference to [2]). Although we restrict our discussion to the case K = 3, all presented theoretical results can be trivially extended to any dimension K > 0.…”
Section: Strict Triangular Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But imagine we have just a little bigger instance and that only at vertex v 8 , for example, an additional distance d i ,8 , i <5, is available. In this case, we do not know how refined the sample from [falsed_2,5,trued¯2,5] should be in order to obtain a position for v 8 that satisfies dtrue_i,8||x8xi||d¯i,8. The main problem of the classical approach is that if we sample many values, the search space increases drastically, and for small samples, no solution is found . To avoid sampling process, we should manipulate arcs in a continuous way.…”
Section: Ibp and The Classical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problem of the classical approach is that if we sample many values, the search space increases drastically, and for small samples, no solution is found [29]. To avoid sampling process, we should manipulate arcs in a continuous way.…”
Section: Ibp and The Classical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The branch and prune (BP) is a general framework for the solution of DGP K for which the search domain can be discretized (Lavor et al., ; Liberti et al., ). The main idea is to recursively construct the search tree the search tree, and check the feasibility of candidate vertex positions as soon as these positions are computed (Cassioli et al, ; Gonçalves and Mucherino, ). In fact, while assumption 2 ensures that the number of reference distances is at least K , more than K references could be actually available.…”
Section: Definitions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%