2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2005.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm to detect TCP spurious timeouts and its application to operational UMTS/GPRS networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] reports on measurements from a relatively early GPRS setup, where most problems seem to be associated with mobile connections and automatic link adaption. The results of passively monitoring live GPRS/UMTS networks are shown in [4], [5]. Both actually identify a low rate of spurious timeouts in live networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[3] reports on measurements from a relatively early GPRS setup, where most problems seem to be associated with mobile connections and automatic link adaption. The results of passively monitoring live GPRS/UMTS networks are shown in [4], [5]. Both actually identify a low rate of spurious timeouts in live networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because TCP cannot distinguish congestion-induced from the loss over the wireless link or a sudden increase in delay, it retransmits a packet and reduces the sending rate unnecessarily. Varcica et al have detected spurious retransmissions in the operational UMTS/GPRS network and concluded that spurious timeouts are infrequent [14]. However, they could not distinguish the TCP flows of mobile users from those without mobility.…”
Section: Tcp Traffic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of occurrence for spurious timeouts is not well understood over the range of networks that comprise the Internet of today. There are several proposed solutions for the spurious timeout problem (for example (Sarolahti et al, 2003)) that implies that it is a common problem, but other research has shown very little frequency of spurious timeouts (Vacirca et al, 2006).…”
Section: Modified Retransmit Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%