2004
DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.1030.0045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm to Compute the Waiting Time Distribution for the M/G/1 Queue

Abstract: In many modern applications of queueing theory, the classical assumption of exponentially decaying service distributions does not apply. In particular, Internet and insurance risk problems may involve heavy-tailed distributions. A difficulty with heavy-tailed distributions is that they may not have closed-form, analytic Laplace transforms. This makes numerical methods, which use the Laplace transform, challenging. In this paper, we develop a method for approximating Laplace transforms. Using the approximation,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since none of the moments exists in this case of Pareto inter-batch arrival time distribution, we calculate median from A(x) which is equal to 0.5 to consider an average of inter-batch arrival time as 20.882547 so that λ = 0.047887 and ρ = λḡ/μ * = 0.115012. We use geometric transform approximation method as described by Shortle et al (2004). As discussed by Shortle et al, we consider N = 100 probabilities y i = 1 − q i (1 ≤ i ≤ 100, 0 < q < 1).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since none of the moments exists in this case of Pareto inter-batch arrival time distribution, we calculate median from A(x) which is equal to 0.5 to consider an average of inter-batch arrival time as 20.882547 so that λ = 0.047887 and ρ = λḡ/μ * = 0.115012. We use geometric transform approximation method as described by Shortle et al (2004). As discussed by Shortle et al, we consider N = 100 probabilities y i = 1 − q i (1 ≤ i ≤ 100, 0 < q < 1).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortle et al (2004) propose a generalization of the TAM method called geometric TAM or GTAM. Their idea is to pick quantiles further out in the tail of the distribution.…”
Section: The Transform Approximation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If q is very close to 1 (0.999) the tail is not captured, but if it is close to the 0, the body of the distribution is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 F o r P e e r R e v i e w O n l y taken into account. In Shortle et al (2004), the authors propose choosing q so that the T AM mean matches the mean of the original distribution. Our experiments showed that in that way, the obtained value for r 0 (0.5872) is similar to that found with the original TAM but given the extra effort needed to find the optimal q, the computational time increases.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Tam And Level Crossing Methods With Simulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, I take up one of the numerical example used recently to demonstrate a new method for computing waiting-time distributions in M/G/1 queues with heavy-tailed service time distributions [20]. In the example considered here, the service times X i follow a unit Pareto distribution of the form…”
Section: Waiting Times In M/p/1 Queuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the problem, the improvement in computation time over the already highly efficient methods of Ref. [20] was seven to 58 fold (Tab. 3.4).…”
Section: Waiting Times In M/p/1 Queuesmentioning
confidence: 99%