2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm to Automate Yeast Segmentation and Tracking

Abstract: Our understanding of dynamic cellular processes has been greatly enhanced by rapid advances in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Imaging single cells has emphasized the prevalence of phenomena that can be difficult to infer from population measurements, such as all-or-none cellular decisions, cell-to-cell variability, and oscillations. Examination of these phenomena requires segmenting and tracking individual cells over long periods of time. However, accurate segmentation and tracking of cells is difficult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
100
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Images were taken for at most 20 positions every 3 min. Image analysis was performed as previously described (62). Gene activation time was calculated as in Skotheim et al (63) relative to the time Whi5 concentration in the nucleus is half-maximum, which corresponds to the point of commitment to cell division (37).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were taken for at most 20 positions every 3 min. Image analysis was performed as previously described (62). Gene activation time was calculated as in Skotheim et al (63) relative to the time Whi5 concentration in the nucleus is half-maximum, which corresponds to the point of commitment to cell division (37).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were acquired every 3 min., and multiple fields were followed simultaneously. Fluorescence data were analyzed via automated algorithms [55] to determine midpoint times of Whi5-mCherry nuclear exit and Sic1-GFP degradation. Phase-contrast images were inspected manually to determine the time of bud emergence and the cell diameters at Whi5 exit and budding onset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic hardware-based focusing was performed by Definite Focus. The blue fluorescence (480/40 nm) and yellow fluorescence (535/30 nm) on excitation at 436 ± 25 nm, as well as phase images, were recorded every 30 s. Images were analyzed using custom Matlab software [22] that automatically tracks cells and quantifies fluorescence intensities. Mean Venus/eCFP pixel intensities for each cell were determined from 5 min before until 10 min after the step increase in glucose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%