2018
DOI: 10.30898/1684-1719.2018.12.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm of global maximum search for evaluating position estimation of electromagnetic emitting source by a passive radar system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the conducted analysis of the frequency of abnormal errors and relative time costs in the course of calculations by the proposed algorithm of search with the adaptive interval for the narrow-base subsystems and combined passive system, as well as wide-base passive system [8], show a significant saving of computing costs (from 3 to 20 times, depending on the type of passive system) for the search for the extremum in comparison with the universal method of searching the global extremum, such as "particle swarm" [9], [10]. The proposed algorithm provides a zero frequency of abnormal errors, while the universal algorithm is characterized by the frequency of abnormal errors around 0.01.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the conducted analysis of the frequency of abnormal errors and relative time costs in the course of calculations by the proposed algorithm of search with the adaptive interval for the narrow-base subsystems and combined passive system, as well as wide-base passive system [8], show a significant saving of computing costs (from 3 to 20 times, depending on the type of passive system) for the search for the extremum in comparison with the universal method of searching the global extremum, such as "particle swarm" [9], [10]. The proposed algorithm provides a zero frequency of abnormal errors, while the universal algorithm is characterized by the frequency of abnormal errors around 0.01.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%