2015 18th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1109/nbis.2015.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm of City-Level Landmark Mining Based on Internet Forum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of the verification results cannot be guaranteed if only using single database. After Structon, the researchers use multiple database to verify the provincial and city-level locations and use zip codes for further verification [13][14][15]. Those strategies improved the accuracy of landmarks obviously but did not reach the requirement of street-level landmarks evaluation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reliability of the verification results cannot be guaranteed if only using single database. After Structon, the researchers use multiple database to verify the provincial and city-level locations and use zip codes for further verification [13][14][15]. Those strategies improved the accuracy of landmarks obviously but did not reach the requirement of street-level landmarks evaluation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of [12], Jiang H et al [13] exclude the cloud services landmarks according to cloud service providers' IP address (such as Amazon AWS, Rackspace Hosting, and other top cloud providers), exclude hosting landmarks whose organizations in Whois do not contain specific keywords such as "university", "academy", or "institution", and use MaxMind database to verify landmarks' city location. E-GeoTrack algorithm [14] based on voting strategy and implicit information in nearest router was proposed to evaluate Internet forum landmarks obtained from a web page. Above methods can only evaluate the accuracy of city location, and there are large errors in fine-grained geolocation using evaluated landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ey significantly improved the accuracy of landmarks based on the reduction of evaluation costs. Zhu et al [14] proposed the E-GeoTrack algorithm to vote on the city of a landmark based on the implicit information in the nearest router. However, these methods can only determine the city-level location of the landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to obtain abundant street-level landmarks in a short time is a problem that needs to be solved in street-level IP geolocation. Currently, the main methods for obtaining landmarks are databases query and Web-based mining [Guo, Liu, Shen et al (2009); Zhu, Luo, Liu et al (2015); Wang, Burgener, Flores et al (2011); Jiang, Liu and Matthews (2016)]. The landmarks acquisition based on the IP location databases query uses the databases' API interface to acquire landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structon is a typical method based on Web mining, which brings possibility to street-level IP geolocation. After Structon, Zhu et al [Zhu, Luo, Liu et al (2015)] proposed a city-level landmark mining method based on Internet forum. Wang et al [Wang, Burgener, Flores et al (2011)] acquire organization's location and Web servers according online maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%