2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm for underdetermined mixing matrix estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of each cluster center was analyzed and calculated by substitution into Eq. (17). The specific performance parameters are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experiments 2 and Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy of each cluster center was analyzed and calculated by substitution into Eq. (17). The specific performance parameters are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experiments 2 and Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimated mixing matrices were substituted into Eq. (17) to obtain the following: the NMSE for 2 using only the DBSCAN algorithm was À 38.2753 dB, the NMSE for A 3 using the K-means only algorithm was À 34.1992 dB, the NMSE for 4 using the K-Hough algorithm was À 40.9120 dB, and the NMSE for 1 using the proposed algorithm was À 59.9163 dB. Thus, we can see that the accuracy of the estimated mixing matrix using the traditional K-means algorithm is relatively low, whereas that using the K-Hough algorithm with HT is higher but not sufficiently high, and it requires prior knowledge of the number of source signals.…”
Section: Experiments 2 and Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The normalized mean square error is chosen as the evaluation criterion of the mixing matrix estimation [14,22,23], which can be expressed as:…”
Section: Evaluation Criteria Of Estimation Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that several algorithms in [9,[14][15][16] can obtain the mixing matrix successfully. In this paper, we assume that the mixing matrix has been estimated 55 accurately in the first stage of SCA-based method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%