1979
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1979.1102177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm for tracking multiple targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
742
0
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,397 publications
(794 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
742
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Tracking each occupant, however, has the burden of maintaining state estimates (e.g., position, velocity) for each of them even when, for example, they stop moving to sit at a desk. Nonetheless, it is worthwhile to review some prior literature on this multitarget tracking problem studied for radar and sonar systems [e.g., Bar-Shalom and Tse (1975), Reid (1979), Fortmann et al (1983), Bar-Shalom and Fortmann (1988), BarShalom (1990BarShalom ( , 1992, Blackman and Popoli (1999), Bar-Shalom and Blair (2000)] due to common aspects of the two problems. A sequence of radar or sonar detections associated with a particular object (target) enable estimation of the object's trajectory by techniques such as Kalman filtering (Kalman, 1960) or particle filtering (Gordon et al, 1993).…”
Section: Occupancy Tracking Versus Tracking Occupantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tracking each occupant, however, has the burden of maintaining state estimates (e.g., position, velocity) for each of them even when, for example, they stop moving to sit at a desk. Nonetheless, it is worthwhile to review some prior literature on this multitarget tracking problem studied for radar and sonar systems [e.g., Bar-Shalom and Tse (1975), Reid (1979), Fortmann et al (1983), Bar-Shalom and Fortmann (1988), BarShalom (1990BarShalom ( , 1992, Blackman and Popoli (1999), Bar-Shalom and Blair (2000)] due to common aspects of the two problems. A sequence of radar or sonar detections associated with a particular object (target) enable estimation of the object's trajectory by techniques such as Kalman filtering (Kalman, 1960) or particle filtering (Gordon et al, 1993).…”
Section: Occupancy Tracking Versus Tracking Occupantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it performs the matching at one instant; thus, it can only be locally optimal at that point in time. Another approach that does account for the time history of detections is the multiple hypothesis test (MHT) (Reid, 1979). At the time of each new detection MHT evaluates a set of hypotheses over the entire set totaling N T detections to date.…”
Section: Occupancy Tracking Versus Tracking Occupantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former, a number of the most likely hypotheses are maintained at each time step, where each hypothesis consists of its own set of tracks. This is the original approach, presented in [98], and it is relatively simple to implement. The main drawback, however, is that multiple copies of identical tracks might be maintained in different hypotheses.…”
Section: Multiple Hypothesis Trackermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach to dealing with the data association problem called multiple hypothesis tracking (MHT) was proposed by Reid [111]. The idea is to keep multiple possible associations (or hypotheses) of observations to existing tracks, new tracks and possible false alarms.…”
Section: (B) Multi-object Tracking and Data Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%