2019
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm for the simulation of curvilinear plane‐strain and axisymmetric hydraulic fractures with lag using the universal meshes

Abstract: Summary We present an algorithm to simulate curvilinear hydraulic fractures in plane strain and axisymmetry. We restrict our attention to sharp fractures propagating in an isotropic, linear elastic medium and driven by the injection of a laminar, Newtonian fluid governed by lubrication theory, and we require the existence of a finite lag region between the fluid front and the crack tip. The key novelty of our approach is in how we discretize the evolving crack and fluid domains: we utilize universal meshes (UM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We solve the fully coupled problem numerically using the method presented in Grossman-Ponemon and Lew (2019). All simulations were run in a square domain with a domain edge length of L = 100a c .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We solve the fully coupled problem numerically using the method presented in Grossman-Ponemon and Lew (2019). All simulations were run in a square domain with a domain edge length of L = 100a c .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now comment on modifications to the algorithm in Grossman-Ponemon and Lew (2019) to account for the depressurization of the volcanic chamber and the pressure boundary condition at the inlet of the dike.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of changes to orientation, several different criteria are typically employed, such as the maximum hoop stress criteria (Erdogan and Sih 1963;Williams and Ewing 1972;Finnie and Saith 1973) or the maximum energy release rate condition (Ewing et al 1976;Cotterell 1965;Hussain et al 1974). Examples of works from the hydraulic fracture field employing such criteria include He and Zhuang (2018), Jang et al (2020) and Grossman-Ponemon and Lew (2019).…”
Section: Governing Equations For Hydraulic Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other issues associated with modeling this complex phenomenon include the presence of different layers of rock formation; variation of the in situ confining stress; leakage of hydraulic fluid; effect of temperature and shear on the rheology of the fracture fluid; the movement of the suspended sorted sand within the fracture; and so forth 5 . As a result, several models for the simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation have been developed to date 5–26 . The injection rate of the fracturing fluid, rock properties, and rheology are the main input parameters for these models, while the geometry, path, and fluid pressure are some of the output of the simulations 27 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%