2006
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.6.458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm for the Identification of Undiagnosed COPD Cases Using Administrative Claims Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 A diagnostic algorithm for COPD used in a UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink study was less sensitive and specific, 14 and algorithms derived from administrative data had lower sensitivity and PPV than those observed in our study. [15][16][17] Little is known about diagnostic algorithms for osteoarthritis, though validation results from a predictive algorithm used in a computerized, diagnostic database in the United States had outcomes similar to those of this study. 18 The CPCSSN case definition for dementia performed better than those constructed from Quebec billing data (sensitivity of 12.9%-39.7%) 19 and Canadian administrative hospital discharge data (sensitivity of 32.3%-66.9%, specificity of 100.0%).…”
Section: Overall Study Samplesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…13 A diagnostic algorithm for COPD used in a UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink study was less sensitive and specific, 14 and algorithms derived from administrative data had lower sensitivity and PPV than those observed in our study. [15][16][17] Little is known about diagnostic algorithms for osteoarthritis, though validation results from a predictive algorithm used in a computerized, diagnostic database in the United States had outcomes similar to those of this study. 18 The CPCSSN case definition for dementia performed better than those constructed from Quebec billing data (sensitivity of 12.9%-39.7%) 19 and Canadian administrative hospital discharge data (sensitivity of 32.3%-66.9%, specificity of 100.0%).…”
Section: Overall Study Samplesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For example, one validation study used a 1:3 casecontrol design to assess the accuracy of COPD case-finding algorithms in administrative billing data. 23 The results from this study estimated a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 82% (compared with our validation study, which indicated 41% sensitivity and 99% specificity). Another validation study for a diabetes diagnostic algorithm using administrative data yielded a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We also had no information on smoking and disease severity, which may lead to underestimate or overestimate the true economic burden of SAS in this population. Mapel and colleagues developed an algorithm based on medical and pharmacy claims records from a health maintenance organization to predict individuals at risk for having undiagnosed COPD [30]. Future research is needed to validate the algorithm to identify undiagnosed or uncoded COPD and asthma patients, especially in the Medicaid population in which obstructive lung disease is prevalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%