1985
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1985.1096198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm for the Design of Labeled-Transition Finite-State Vector Quantizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to predictive coding is encoding by a finite-state quantizer (see eg. [3,4]). A finite-state quantizer is a finite-state machine used for data compression: each successive source sample is quantized using a quantizer code book that depends on the encoder state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to predictive coding is encoding by a finite-state quantizer (see eg. [3,4]). A finite-state quantizer is a finite-state machine used for data compression: each successive source sample is quantized using a quantizer code book that depends on the encoder state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore finite-state VQ [4] (FSVQ) has been proposed. It exploits the statistical correlation between neighbouring blocks to reduce the bit rate (BR) of the compressed image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use (4) to compute the difference between dis 1 and dis 2 diff = dis 1 − dis 2 (4) (i) If the value of diff is smaller than the pre-defined threshold TH diff , ESMVQ decides that the codeword CW bm1 is the closest codeword for the current block X in the codebook. ESMVQ determines CW bm1 to be the encoding result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ordinary VQ scheme exploits the statistical redundancy within a vector and yields an acceptable performance at low bit rates, the finite-state vector quantization (FSVQ) schemes can improve performance over the ordinary VQ by exploiting the correlation between neighboring vectors within an image [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The encoding state of the current input vector is decided by the previous encoded neighboring vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%