1989
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.2.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm for Solving the Job-Shop Problem

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a branch and bound method for solving the job-shop problem. It is based on one-machine scheduling problems and is made more efficient by several propositions which limit the search tree by using immediate selections. It solved for the first time the famous 10 \times 10 job-shop problem proposed by Muth and Thompson in 1963.job shop scheduling, branch-and-bound, computational experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
230
0
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 645 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
230
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most popular filtering techniques for the unary resource constraint is known as Edge-Finding (Carlier and Pinson (1989), Nuijten (1994)). Let T denote a set of tasks sharing a unary resource, Ω denote a subset of T , and let t i Ω (respectively t i Ω)…”
Section: Traditional Constraint Programming Approach ("Heavy Model")mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most popular filtering techniques for the unary resource constraint is known as Edge-Finding (Carlier and Pinson (1989), Nuijten (1994)). Let T denote a set of tasks sharing a unary resource, Ω denote a subset of T , and let t i Ω (respectively t i Ω)…”
Section: Traditional Constraint Programming Approach ("Heavy Model")mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With D = d 3 = 24 we get the tails q 1 = 19, q 2 = 14, q 3 = 0, q 4 = 12, q 5 = 8. Let us assume that on the production machine the jobs are processed in the sequence (1,2,4,3,5); in the transportation stage the batch sequence is ({1}, {2, 4}, {3}, {5}). A corresponding feasible schedule with C q max = 24 and L max = 0 (i.e.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an upper bound computed by a fast queuing algorithm, or greedy algorithm (Carlier and Pinson, 1989). The TBON graph remains applicable if this bound can still be assumed as an absolute "limit" (any lateness is forbidden).…”
Section: The Tbon Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%